General Comparative Study on Constitutional Criteria about Legitimate State Intervention for the sake of Risk Management
Project/Area Number |
25380047
|
Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
Section | 一般 |
Research Field |
Public law
|
Research Institution | Waseda University |
Principal Investigator |
|
Project Period (FY) |
2013-04-01 – 2016-03-31
|
Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2015)
|
Budget Amount *help |
¥4,160,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,200,000、Indirect Cost: ¥960,000)
Fiscal Year 2015: ¥1,430,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,100,000、Indirect Cost: ¥330,000)
Fiscal Year 2014: ¥1,560,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,200,000、Indirect Cost: ¥360,000)
Fiscal Year 2013: ¥1,170,000 (Direct Cost: ¥900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥270,000)
|
Keywords | 比例原則 / 違憲性審査基準 / リスク社会 / リスク管理的活動 / 法治国家 / 平等 / 社会的排除 / 人権保障 / 社会モデル障害観 / 間接差別 / 社会的障害モデル / ドイツ連邦憲法裁判所 / ヨーロッパ司法裁判所 / 最高裁判所 |
Outline of Final Research Achievements |
It is the purpose of this research to differentiate between constitutionally permissible intervention and impermissible ones within the area of state's activities dealing with tasks of risk management. State's risk managing activities and human rights guarantee stand partly in relationship of mutual dependency, partly in a severe tension. In the latter case, there should be a judicial mechanism through which governmental value judgment regarding suitability of certain legislative goals and governmental fact-relating assessment about efficiency of certain measure can be scrutinized separately and interaction between legislature and judiciary can be put in action.
|
Report
(4 results)
Research Products
(13 results)