Verbunden Vertraege und Internationalen Privatrecht
| Project/Area Number |
25380056
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
International law
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Hokkaido University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
SHIMA TAKUYA 北海道大学, 法学研究科, 教授 (80377613)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2013-04-01 – 2017-03-31
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2016)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥3,380,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥780,000)
Fiscal Year 2015: ¥1,040,000 (Direct Cost: ¥800,000、Indirect Cost: ¥240,000)
Fiscal Year 2014: ¥1,300,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥300,000)
Fiscal Year 2013: ¥1,040,000 (Direct Cost: ¥800,000、Indirect Cost: ¥240,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 国際法学 / 国際私法 / 複合取引 / 準拠法 / 第三者与信販売取引 / ファイナンス・リース取引 / 国際民事手続法 / 抵触法 / 複合的不法行為 |
|---|
| Outline of Final Research Achievements |
The research project puts an focus on this academic problem: what is the justifiable applicable law rule regarding the "verbunden Vertraege"? Dominant opinion in Germany fixes separatedly an applicable law as to each contract, even when it is included in the "verbunden Vertraege". On the other hand, recently advocated opinion shares that only one applicable law should be decided as to the whole "verbunden Vertraege" because of their economic unitarity, and then contracts included in the "Verbunden Vertraege" have the same applicable law. The latter opinion has its novelty in directing its attention to new phenomenon, contracts' union, but it should not be adopted as an interpretation of the Rome I regulation, because it could be contradictory to the provisions of this regulation.
|
Report
(5 results)
Research Products
(24 results)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
[Book] 電子商取引法2013
Author(s)
松本恒雄，齋藤雅弘，町村泰貴編
Total Pages
501
Publisher
勁草書房
Related Report
