| Budget Amount *help |
¥4,940,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,800,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,140,000)
Fiscal Year 2017: ¥910,000 (Direct Cost: ¥700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥210,000)
Fiscal Year 2016: ¥910,000 (Direct Cost: ¥700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥210,000)
Fiscal Year 2015: ¥910,000 (Direct Cost: ¥700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥210,000)
Fiscal Year 2014: ¥910,000 (Direct Cost: ¥700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥210,000)
Fiscal Year 2013: ¥1,300,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥300,000)
|
|---|
| Outline of Final Research Achievements |
This study researches the regulations of service contract and the general contract theories.The main result of this study is following:
First,this study points out the two views of the justification for the free cancellation as a default rule. The one is to promote the active use of property or manpower, the second is to ensure the self-control of the own nterests. Secondly, this study shows that the applicability of the rule that the expenses taht could resonably have been earned using the capacity has become available should be deducted from the damage is narrow, as a result of researching the damage due to the cancellation by the client of service contract. Thirdly,this study shows taht consumer protection regulations, specially the certain business regulations have a tendency to consider strongly the efficiency and the cost-benefit analysis, as a result of researching the regulation of the specific service consumer contract.
|
