Counter-terrorism Measures through Deradicalization by Muslim States: A Comparison between a Democratic State (Indonesia) and an Authoritarian State (Saudi Arabia)
Project/Area Number |
25380195
|
Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
Section | 一般 |
Research Field |
International relations
|
Research Institution | Kobe University |
Principal Investigator |
Nakamura Satoru 神戸大学, 国際文化学研究科, 准教授 (60359867)
|
Project Period (FY) |
2013-04-01 – 2017-03-31
|
Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2016)
|
Budget Amount *help |
¥3,770,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥870,000)
Fiscal Year 2015: ¥1,300,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥300,000)
Fiscal Year 2014: ¥1,170,000 (Direct Cost: ¥900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥270,000)
Fiscal Year 2013: ¥1,300,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥300,000)
|
Keywords | インドネシア / サウディアラビア / テロ対策 / 比較政治 / 国際安全保障 / イスラーム / 民主主義 / 権威主義 / 過激派 / テロリズム / 中東 / ムスリム / 脅威 |
Outline of Final Research Achievements |
Counter-terrorism measures through deradicalization was initiated slowly and in smaller scale in Indonesia, a democratic state, and quickly and in larger scale in Saudi Arabia, a monarchy, after they confronted al-Qaeda-linked active threats. In Indonesia, the lack of a sufficient coordination, insufficient budget, and the opposition of human rights bodies and some Islamic groups impeded the BNPT, (national Agency for Combating Terrorism) from exerting coordinating power over counter-terrorism measures. In Saudi Arabia, government and citizens cooperated in counter-terrorism policy to adopt a conceptual framework acceptable to Muslim views. However, after the Arab Spring, Saudi Arabia enforced first counter-terrorism law, which adopted articles to include ambiguous definition on terrorism, and arrest innocent human right activists.
|
Report
(5 results)
Research Products
(17 results)