| Project/Area Number |
25463351
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Fundamental nursing
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Josai International University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
IWATA HIROKO 城西国際大学, 看護学部, 教授 (20300171)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
IIDA Kanae 城西国際大学, 看護学部, 教授 (20159552)
SUENAGA Kaoru 城西国際大学, 看護学部, 准教授 (40341870)
SAKASHITA Takako 城西国際大学, 看護学部, 准教授 (50341871)
WANO Chieko 城西国際大学, 看護学部, 准教授 (90461839)
NAGAI Eiko 城西国際大学, 看護学部, 准教授 (10352684)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Renkei-kenkyūsha) |
OKU Yuriko 城西国際大学, 看護学部, 助教 (90515842)
HORII Motoko 城西国際大学, 看護学部, 助教 (90647033)
HOSHINO Satoko 城西国際大学, 看護学部, 助教 (20595491)
FUNAHASHI Yukiko 城西国際大学, 看護学部, 助教 (60438546)
MATSUO Naomi 城西国際大学, 看護学部, 助教 (70457753)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2013-04-01 – 2016-03-31
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2015)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥3,900,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥900,000)
Fiscal Year 2015: ¥1,300,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥300,000)
Fiscal Year 2014: ¥1,040,000 (Direct Cost: ¥800,000、Indirect Cost: ¥240,000)
Fiscal Year 2013: ¥1,560,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,200,000、Indirect Cost: ¥360,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 医療偏在地 / 看護現任教育 / 地域密着型協働教育 / 看護師の教育力 / 地域連携 / 実習指導能力 / 医療偏在地域 / 大学と病院の連携 / 協働的看護教育 / 地域貢献 / 看護師の教育能力向上 / 実習指導能力の育成 / 地域密着型教育 / 看護師の教育力向上 / 協働的教育システム / モデル事業 / 地域密着型 / 協働的看護教育システム / 現任教育の現状と課題 |
|---|
| Outline of Final Research Achievements |
1) Nationwide survey through questionnaires and interviews with nursing managers of small and medium-sized hospitals at maldistribution area of health care.2) The Department of Nursing Education collaborated on model educational projects with local hospitals.
1) We discovered the following problems in nursing education programs at local hospital: “not enough staff,” “inconsistencies in the quality of nursing educators,” “time constraints,” and “issues with balancing work and family life”.2) Creating group awareness, sharing common goals, and scheduling regular meetings were effective ways to uncover problems between the university and hospital. Making use of PDCA cycles and appointing a group leader was also important to ensure communication and understanding between faculty and nursing. Although we were able to build an exchange of information between two hospitals, we still have yet to build a regional network.
|
