| Project/Area Number |
25463582
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Gerontological nursing
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Japanese Red Cross Hokkaido college of Nursing |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
ISHIZAKI TOMOKO 日本赤十字北海道看護大学, 看護学部, 教授 (50113783)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
則包 和也 弘前大学, 保健学研究科, 講師 (00342345)
西村 美八 京都橘大学, 看護学部, 専任講師 (00436015)
古川 照美 青森県立保健大学, 健康科学部, 教授 (60333720)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2013-04-01 – 2017-03-31
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2016)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥5,200,000 (Direct Cost: ¥4,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,200,000)
Fiscal Year 2015: ¥1,560,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,200,000、Indirect Cost: ¥360,000)
Fiscal Year 2014: ¥1,820,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,400,000、Indirect Cost: ¥420,000)
Fiscal Year 2013: ¥1,820,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,400,000、Indirect Cost: ¥420,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 精神科看護 / 精神科看護師 / 退院支援技術 / 精神科退院支援評価 / 精神科医療 / 医療と地域の連携 / 精神看護学 / 精神科病院 / 退院支援評価指標 / 看護学 |
|---|
| Outline of Final Research Achievements |
The purpose of this research is building of qualitative evaluation method of the leaving supporting technology which established the leaving supporting technology (LST) asked from a psychiatry nurse, developed the "psychiatry leaving support evaluation index" which leads to qualitative evaluation and utilized the index. We investigated nationwide by the unsigned automatic recording questionnaire method which was made based on LST item which are study results targeted for the nurse who works at a psychiatry ward and concerns leaving support for more than 3 years. The purpose of an investigation is that "the psychiatry leaving support evaluation index" is valued the implementation situation of LST. We got cooperation of Japanese Psychiatry Nursing Association in case of object's election. A questionnaire was distributed to 1300 nurses who work at 400 establishments of psychiatry hospital, and the rate of collection was 612 votes (47.1 % of rate of collection).
|
