Designing effective deliberation styles within a goup of lay judges and professionals by using experimental psychological approach
| Project/Area Number |
25780381
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B)
|
| Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
|---|
| Research Field |
Social psychology
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Kwansei Gakuin University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
MURAYAMA Aya 関西学院大学, 文学部, 受託研究員 (10609936)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2013-04-01 – 2016-03-31
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2015)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥3,900,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥900,000)
Fiscal Year 2015: ¥780,000 (Direct Cost: ¥600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥180,000)
Fiscal Year 2014: ¥1,430,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,100,000、Indirect Cost: ¥330,000)
Fiscal Year 2013: ¥1,690,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,300,000、Indirect Cost: ¥390,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 評議コミュニケーション / 裁判員制度 / 公正世界信念 / 評議 / 公正推論 / 社会心理学 / 裁判員裁判 / 専門家 / 非専門家 |
|---|
| Outline of Final Research Achievements |
The purpose of this study was to investigate the way to enhance effective communication between non-expert and expert during deliberations, by applying several discussion techniques from perspectives of experimental social psychology. In addition, characteristics of non-experts’ legal decision was tested. The results of one experiment revealed that participants tended to be satisfied with deliberation when 1) searching and organizing information individually before deliberation and 2) expert proceeds deliberation based on important issues with temporal sequence. However, this tendency was only apparent when decision of expert was severer. We also found that dehumanization of the perpetrator partially mediated the relationship between belief in immanent justice and victim derogation.
|
Report
(4 results)
Research Products
(13 results)
