| Project/Area Number |
25870391
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B)
|
| Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
|---|
| Research Field |
Epidemiology and preventive medicine
Emergency medicine
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Osaka University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2013-04-01 – 2016-03-31
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2015)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥2,730,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,100,000、Indirect Cost: ¥630,000)
Fiscal Year 2015: ¥910,000 (Direct Cost: ¥700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥210,000)
Fiscal Year 2014: ¥910,000 (Direct Cost: ¥700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥210,000)
Fiscal Year 2013: ¥910,000 (Direct Cost: ¥700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥210,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 蘇生科学 / 循環器学 / 疫学 / 救急医学 / 病院外心停止 / 臨床疫学 |
|---|
| Outline of Final Research Achievements |
The aim of this study conducted multiphasic analyses on factors associated with the effective use of public-access automated external defibrillations (AEDs) as well as the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). We collected approximately 56000 OHCA patients in Osaka Prefecture, Japan between 2005 and 2012. Public-access AED pads were applied to 3.5% of OHCA patients (351/9978) between 2011 and 2012. Arrests in public places, witness by bystanders, and bystander-initiated CPR were significantly associated with high proportion of public-access AED pad application. Between 2005 and 2012, the chest compression-only CPR (CCCPR) instruction group received bystander CPR more frequently than conventional CPR instruction group (70.0% versus 62.1%, p<0.001). In the multivariable analysis, CCCPR dispatcher instruction was significantly associated with provision of bystander CPR compared with conventional CPR instruction (adjusted odds ratio 1.44, 95% CI 1.34-1.55).
|
