| Budget Amount *help |
¥4,680,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,080,000)
Fiscal Year 2017: ¥1,170,000 (Direct Cost: ¥900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥270,000)
Fiscal Year 2016: ¥1,170,000 (Direct Cost: ¥900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥270,000)
Fiscal Year 2015: ¥1,170,000 (Direct Cost: ¥900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥270,000)
Fiscal Year 2014: ¥1,170,000 (Direct Cost: ¥900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥270,000)
|
|---|
| Outline of Final Research Achievements |
First, we examined the applicability of semantic relativism to legal judgement/statement. We found that, contrary to its appearances, the alleged merits of truth relativism over content relativism is unwarranted because the "faultless disagreement" phenomena, which semantic relativism resorts to in order to solve the disagreement problem, can also provide theoretical resources for rather classical form of indexical views such as speaker relativism to avoid the problem. Second, we examined the plurality of the subject of legal judgement. We found the reality of group agency to be metaphysically unproblematic and methodological individualism self-destructing. Finally we classified various models of law (i.e. pure imperative theory, Kelsenian sanction theory etc.) and put them into a spectrum and make it correspondent with the various understanding of legal subjects (i.e. as person with reason or as human animal).
|
