Interaction analysis of communication in Lay-Judge deliberations: how lay judges think and argue
Project/Area Number |
26380014
|
Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
Section | 一般 |
Research Field |
Fundamental law
|
Research Institution | Tokai University |
Principal Investigator |
|
Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
森本 郁代 関西学院大学, 法学部, 教授 (40434881)
小宮 友根 東北学院大学, 経済学部, 准教授 (40714001)
|
Project Period (FY) |
2014-04-01 – 2017-03-31
|
Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2016)
|
Budget Amount *help |
¥4,550,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,050,000)
Fiscal Year 2016: ¥1,170,000 (Direct Cost: ¥900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥270,000)
Fiscal Year 2015: ¥1,300,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥300,000)
Fiscal Year 2014: ¥2,080,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥480,000)
|
Keywords | 法社会学 / エスノメソドロジー / 裁判員評議 / 会話分析 / 相互行為分析 / 裁判員 / 評議 / 法的コミュニケーション |
Outline of Final Research Achievements |
Our research produced the following 7 results: 1)Professional judges tend to be oriented towards controlling lay-judges' discourse; 2)interactions exist between law and commonsense reasoning; 3)asymmetrical relations exist between pro-judges and lay-judges, 4)systematic analysis of readiness and availability of lay-judges' expression of opinion can be examined by attending to the characteristics of turns-at-talk in the deliberation; 5)interactional features of deliberation conversation was identified; 6)the relationship between commonsense knowledge and reasoning, and legal consequences; 7)narrative construction by lay judges with use of commonsense knowledge was examined and specified.
|
Report
(4 results)
Research Products
(23 results)