| Budget Amount *help |
¥4,680,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,080,000)
Fiscal Year 2017: ¥1,170,000 (Direct Cost: ¥900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥270,000)
Fiscal Year 2016: ¥1,170,000 (Direct Cost: ¥900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥270,000)
Fiscal Year 2015: ¥1,170,000 (Direct Cost: ¥900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥270,000)
Fiscal Year 2014: ¥1,170,000 (Direct Cost: ¥900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥270,000)
|
|---|
| Outline of Final Research Achievements |
In this research, it is main issue to clarify the legal and historical background as to the relationship between the reason and ground of the judgment, and the content of the claims by the parties of the lawsuits and the evidence based on the allegations.
Specifically, we clarified the actual circumstances of the lawsuits described in each judgment document through organizing the materials of the Kamakura Shogunate in connection with the cases of "refusal to summons" defined in Article 35 of the Goseibai-shikimoku. The litigation party who insists on the other party's attitude of refusal to summons and his illegal act, simply did not have the ultimate goal of simply obtaining the judgment to which Article 35 was applied. Rather, the application of Article 35 was the only way intended to fulfill their original requirements. The courts also took an attitude to properly judge whether the litigants' claim was true or false. In this research, we came to present such a hypothesis.
|
