| Project/Area Number |
26380104
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Civil law
|
|---|
| Research Institution | University of Tsukuba |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
Tamura Yoko 筑波大学, ビジネスサイエンス系, 教授 (60344777)
|
|---|
| Research Collaborator |
Gottwald Peter Regensburg Uni.
Roth Herbert Regensburg Uni.
Pruettung Hans Freiburg Uni.
Ervo Laura University of Örebro
Anderson Kent UWA
Chase Oscar NYU
Nottage Luke Sydney U.
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2014-04-01 – 2017-03-31
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2016)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥3,510,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥810,000)
Fiscal Year 2016: ¥1,040,000 (Direct Cost: ¥800,000、Indirect Cost: ¥240,000)
Fiscal Year 2015: ¥1,040,000 (Direct Cost: ¥800,000、Indirect Cost: ¥240,000)
Fiscal Year 2014: ¥1,430,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,100,000、Indirect Cost: ¥330,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 裁判所の釈明 / 裁判所の裁量 / 証明 / 心証開示 / 事実認定 / 当事者の役割 / 弁護士の義務 / 釈明権 / 裁判所 / 心証 / 裁量権 / 証明度 / 民事訴訟 / 証拠の優越 / 高度の蓋然性 / 解明度 |
|---|
| Outline of Final Research Achievements |
This research tried to clarify "the Function and Role of Party and Court for objective Fact-Finding" regarding three dimensions, such as (i) Composition of Fact-Finding, (ii) Party's action for proof during the proceeding based on the burden of proof and standard of proof, and (iii) the role of asking explanation and/or indication of interim impression. As far as regarding (iii), The research found that court should refrain from asking explanation and/or indicating interim impression especially at the stage of settlement, though the court should be active to ask explanation by party and or indicating its impression at the stage of fact-findings in order to persuade the action of party to prove facts.
|
