• Search Research Projects
  • Search Researchers
  • How to Use
  1. Back to previous page

The Study of the right one of the co-litigants to intervene in a procedural act of any other co-litigants

Research Project

Project/Area Number 26380122
Research Category

Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)

Allocation TypeMulti-year Fund
Section一般
Research Field Civil law
Research InstitutionOsaka City University (2015-2016)
Kyushu University (2014)

Principal Investigator

Tsuruta Shigeru  大阪市立大学, 大学院法学研究科, 教授 (90412569)

Project Period (FY) 2014-04-01 – 2017-03-31
Project Status Completed (Fiscal Year 2016)
Budget Amount *help
¥3,510,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥810,000)
Fiscal Year 2016: ¥1,170,000 (Direct Cost: ¥900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥270,000)
Fiscal Year 2015: ¥1,170,000 (Direct Cost: ¥900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥270,000)
Fiscal Year 2014: ¥1,170,000 (Direct Cost: ¥900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥270,000)
Keywords必要的共同訴訟 / 牽制権 / 片面的独立当事者参加 / 独立当事者参加 / 訴訟追行権
Outline of Final Research Achievements

If the subject matter of litigation is to be determined for all co-litigants only as a unified matter, procedural acts performed by one of them become valid only in the interests of all of the co-litigants(Article 40(1)Code of Civil Procedure). The purpose of the rule is to give the right to intervene in a procedural act of any other co-litigants, to one of the co-litigants.

Report

(4 results)
  • 2016 Annual Research Report   Final Research Report ( PDF )
  • 2015 Research-status Report
  • 2014 Research-status Report
  • Research Products

    (8 results)

All 2017 2016 2015

All Journal Article (7 results) (of which Acknowledgement Compliant: 6 results,  Open Access: 2 results) Funded Workshop (1 results)

  • [Journal Article] 片面的独立当事者参加の訴訟構造2017

    • Author(s)
      鶴田 滋
    • Journal Title

      徳田和幸先生古稀祝賀論文集『民事手続法の現代的課題と理論的解明』(弘文堂)

      Volume: なし Pages: 123-143

    • Related Report
      2016 Annual Research Report
    • Acknowledgement Compliant
  • [Journal Article] 複数の株主による責任追及訴訟における必要的共同訴訟の根拠  ――既判力の人的拡張を手がかりに――2017

    • Author(s)
      鶴田滋
    • Journal Title

      立命館法学

      Volume: 2016年5=6号 Pages: 1806-1830

    • Related Report
      2016 Annual Research Report
    • Open Access / Acknowledgement Compliant
  • [Journal Article] 固有必要的共同訴訟における実体適格と訴訟追行権2016

    • Author(s)
      鶴田 滋
    • Journal Title

      松本博之先生古稀記念論文集『民事手続法制の展開と手続原則』(弘文堂)

      Volume: なし Pages: 125-142

    • Related Report
      2016 Annual Research Report
    • Acknowledgement Compliant
  • [Journal Article] 共同訴訟人のうち自己の相続分の全部を譲渡した者と遺産確認の訴えの当事者適格2016

    • Author(s)
      鶴田 滋
    • Journal Title

      判例時報

      Volume: 2277 Pages: 197-203

    • Related Report
      2015 Research-status Report
    • Acknowledgement Compliant
  • [Journal Article] 共有者の内部紛争における固有必要的共同訴訟の根拠と構造2015

    • Author(s)
      鶴田 滋
    • Journal Title

      伊藤眞先生古稀記念論文集『民事手続の現代的使命』(有斐閣)

      Volume: なし Pages: 393-415

    • Related Report
      2014 Research-status Report
    • Acknowledgement Compliant
  • [Journal Article] 口頭弁論終結後の承継人への既判力拡張の意味2015

    • Author(s)
      鶴田 滋
    • Journal Title

      法政研究(九州大学)

      Volume: 81巻4号 Pages: 817-861

    • Related Report
      2014 Research-status Report
    • Open Access / Acknowledgement Compliant
  • [Journal Article] 自己の相続分の全部を譲渡した共同相続人と遺産確認の訴えの当事者適格(最判平成26年4月14日民集68巻2号113頁)2015

    • Author(s)
      鶴田 滋
    • Journal Title

      法学教室判例セレクト2014(Ⅱ)

      Volume: なし Pages: 26-26

    • Related Report
      2014 Research-status Report
  • [Funded Workshop] 大阪市立大学・フライブルク大学日独法学シンポジウム2016

    • Place of Presentation
      ドイツ・フライブルク大学
    • Year and Date
      2016-04-06
    • Related Report
      2016 Annual Research Report

URL: 

Published: 2014-04-04   Modified: 2018-03-22  

Information User Guide FAQ News Terms of Use Attribution of KAKENHI

Powered by NII kakenhi