| Budget Amount *help |
¥4,550,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,050,000)
Fiscal Year 2017: ¥1,170,000 (Direct Cost: ¥900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥270,000)
Fiscal Year 2016: ¥1,170,000 (Direct Cost: ¥900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥270,000)
Fiscal Year 2015: ¥1,040,000 (Direct Cost: ¥800,000、Indirect Cost: ¥240,000)
Fiscal Year 2014: ¥1,170,000 (Direct Cost: ¥900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥270,000)
|
|---|
| Outline of Final Research Achievements |
The purpose is to examine comprehensively how international interventions have been justified as legitimate and pursued in international community. Major findings include: dynamics of evolution of the Monroe Doctrine from unilateral to multilateral idea which would legitimize international intervention in the Americas; a “contradictory” function of the Monroe Doctrine that transformed the relationship between Japan and the U.S., both pursuing regional hegemony respectively in East Asia and the Americas in the first half of the twenty century, from cooperative to conflictual; the logic of“multilateral American exceptionalism”invented by President Obama, seeking for the U.S. participation in legitimate international interventions;“Dysfunction”of the R2P norm which prevented international community’s R2P in Syrian humanitarian crisis; the fact that "the past" as well as "the present" of liberal interventionism suffered from the same "structural problems" defined by Roland Paris.
|
