NATO Debates over East-West Detente and the Johnson Administration
| Project/Area Number |
26380212
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
International relations
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Hiroshima City University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2014-04-01 – 2017-03-31
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2016)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥4,550,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,050,000)
Fiscal Year 2016: ¥1,300,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥300,000)
Fiscal Year 2015: ¥1,690,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,300,000、Indirect Cost: ¥390,000)
Fiscal Year 2014: ¥1,560,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,200,000、Indirect Cost: ¥360,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 米欧関係 / 冷戦 / 緊張緩和 / アメリカ外交史 / 冷戦史 / ヨーロッパ国際関係史 / アメリカ / NATO / デタント / 国際関係史 / 同盟 |
|---|
| Outline of Final Research Achievements |
This study tries to show that Washington supported the Harmel Report of 1967 in order to tame increasing tensions in the Alliance and that it especially put this problem in the context of French withdrawal from the NATO military organization in the previous year. This indicates that the Harmel Report was understood related to the problems within the Alliance and that this report was designed to reduce tensions over the latter. Yet, this US recognition was not necessarily shared with the Europeans. Also, Washington's shift of interest from Western Europe to other parts of the world, especially Vietnam, under the Johnson presidency leads to a possible argument that US original intentions regarding the Harmel Report was not fully explored.
|
Report
(4 results)
Research Products
(1 results)
