Development of a long-term smoking cessation program by promoting family and industrial systems
| Project/Area Number |
26463572
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Community health nursing
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Josai International University (2016)
Kitasato University (2014-2015) |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
Ohno Yoshiko 城西国際大学, 看護学部, 教授 (20347107)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
服部 兼敏 兵庫県立大学, 看護学部, 教授 (10346637)
金子 仁子 慶應義塾大学, 看護医療学部(藤沢), 教授 (40125919)
森谷 栄子 北里大学, 看護学部, 講師 (70348598)
中井 泉 北里大学, 看護学部, 助教 (80523711)
北田 雅子 札幌学院大学, 人文学部, 教授 (40382460)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2014-04-01 – 2017-03-31
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2016)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥4,810,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,110,000)
Fiscal Year 2016: ¥780,000 (Direct Cost: ¥600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥180,000)
Fiscal Year 2015: ¥2,080,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥480,000)
Fiscal Year 2014: ¥1,950,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥450,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 動機づけ面接 / テキストマイニング / 認知行動 / 意思決定 / コミュニティ・システム / 高齢者 / 生活習慣病 / 禁煙 / 動機づけ面接（MI） / 行動変容 / 禁煙プログラム |
|---|
| Outline of Final Research Achievements |
Smoking cessation intervention studies based on quasi-experimental interventions by interviewing showed that the smoking cessation program developed (stage 1) had the higher quit rate after 6 months than in the explanation (control) group of the necessity of smoking cessation. The focus of development in the second stage was to improve the program to make qualitative guarantee of conversation contents according to individuality, which differed depending on the intervenor. We conducted qualitative analyses by evaluation of interaction, and quantitative analyses by text mining of the conversation contents. As the results, it was suggested that the conversation contents of the first interviewing influence whether to quit smoking afterwards. In addition, as an interaction, the smoker expressed emotions frankly, and the intervenor pulled out objectional words of the conversation process of trying to share emotions and values became clear.
|
Report
(4 results)
Research Products
(12 results)
