| Project/Area Number |
26590155
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Challenging Exploratory Research
|
| Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
|---|
| Research Field |
Clinical psychology
|
|---|
| Research Institution | 湘南医療大学 (2016-2017)
Tsukuba University of Technology (2014-2015) |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
KOBAYASHI Kazuhiko 湘南医療大学, 保健医療学部リハビリテーション学科理学療法学専攻, 教授 (60310190)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
辻下 守弘 奈良学園大学, 保健医療学部, 教授 (80280197)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2014-04-01 – 2018-03-31
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2017)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥2,860,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,200,000、Indirect Cost: ¥660,000)
Fiscal Year 2016: ¥1,560,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,200,000、Indirect Cost: ¥360,000)
Fiscal Year 2015: ¥650,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥150,000)
Fiscal Year 2014: ¥650,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥150,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 介護老人保健施設 / 行動分析学 / 介護職員指導 / 移乗介助指導 / 介護職員 / 介護業務への意欲 / 介護業務に対する自己効力感 / 介助方法 / パイロットスタディ / 行動療法研究誌 / 指導プログラムの修正 / 研究の説明及び依頼 / 職員研修会 / パソコン / 視聴覚教材 / パワーポイント / 個別指導 / 自己学習 / 移乗介助 / 行動変容法 |
|---|
| Outline of Final Research Achievements |
We developed educational e-learning software that operates on a PC and explains the theory and methods of care from a behavioral analysis perspective. Afterwards, we evaluated the software’s effect on the participants’ability to move simulated patients from a bed to a wheelchair in a long-term care health facility(15 intervention group, 15 control group). We inspected an intervention effect in prior evaluation, subsequent evaluation and following evaluation. The evaluation contents was used the physical contact rate to a simulated patients for an assistance technology evaluation index.
Consequently, tendency to increase at the time of the tendency to decrease of the physical contact rate at the time of the subsequent evaluation of the intervention group and the follow-up evaluation was recognized. In addition, as a result of subsequent questionnaire about the satisfaction of instruction contents, an almost good answer was provided although there was the negative opinion.
|
