| Budget Amount *help |
¥2,080,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥480,000)
Fiscal Year 2016: ¥650,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥150,000)
Fiscal Year 2015: ¥650,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥150,000)
Fiscal Year 2014: ¥780,000 (Direct Cost: ¥600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥180,000)
|
|---|
| Outline of Final Research Achievements |
After regime transformation, Russian judiciary is managed by three systems of courts, i.e. the constitutional court, arbitration courts and courts of general jurisdiction. The European Court of Human Rights also plays an important role on dispute settling. This pluralistic character of the courts also influences Russian judicial system reform. For example, exposed by demands and logic of market economy, the Arbitration Procedure Code developed so speedily. As a result, significance of the resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court, which previously played an important role in uniforming judicial practices, reduced, basic futures of management of judiciary became much closer to those in the West and stimulated civil procedure reform. Unfortunately, such tendency forced political branches to abolish the Supreme Arbitration Court in 2014, this fact eloquently and paradoxically shows that pluralistic nature of the court system could play a positive role in transitional countries.
|
