Budget Amount *help |
¥1,400,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,400,000)
Fiscal Year 1987: ¥500,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000)
Fiscal Year 1986: ¥900,000 (Direct Cost: ¥900,000)
|
Research Abstract |
Prof. Dr. Arthur Kaufmann at Munich University Held a Basic Seminar or "Philosopy of Law in Nazinsm"at the Winter Term 1981-82. Members of the Seminar Submitted 29 Reports to Prof. Kaufmann. My task of this Project is to Examine These Reports and to Collect Some Primary Materials Relevant to the Reports. I Divide These Reports into Four Spheres: 1. Reports on How Nazism Negated the Traditional Currents of Legal Philosopy; R2. 'Neokantians and Philosopy of Value', R6. 'Interest Jurisprudence', R7. 'Teleological Conceptstructure'. 2. Reports on Philosopy of Law or Legal Thinking Peculiar to Nazism; R1. 'Legal Conception', R3. 'Legal Theory of Race Law', R4. 'Natural Law', R5. 'Hegelians', R8. 'Carl Schmitt and His Concrete Order Thought', R9. 'Concrete General Concept', R10. 'Theory of Constitution', R20. 'Source of Law', R19. 'Theory of Bourgeois Law', R11. Authoritarian State and Total State'. 3. Reports on Some Practical Interpretation and Application of Positive Law; R12. 'Authoritarian Criminal Law', R13. 'Criminologh', R26. 'Interpretation of Criminal Law', R14. 'Legal Person', R17. 'Rechtsfahigkeit', R18. 'Marriage and Family', R21. 'Judiciary Independence', R22. 'Die Richtcrliche Gesetzes-Ablehnung', R24. 'Die Theorie des Subjektiven Rechts', R25. 'Theory of Public Welfare', R28. 'Function of General Clausen', R16. 'Legal Positivism'. 4. Reports on Criticisms of Nazi Philosopy of Law; R15. 'In Postwar Times', R23 'Radbruchs Criticism of Nazism in Prewar Times', R25. Criticism of Nazi Legal Philosopy in DDR.
|