SAXONHOUSE G ミシガン大学, 経済学部, 教授
DENOON David New York University, Department of Political Science, Professor, 政治学部, 教授
INTLIGATOR M カルホルニア大学, ロスアンヂェルス校, 教授
DRYSDALE Peter Australian National University, Australia-Japan Research Center, Professor, 豪日研究所, 所長
韓 昇洙 ソウル大学, 経済学部, 教授
PANAGARIYA A メリーランド大学, 経済学部, 教授
MCGUIRE Martin C. University of Maryland, Department of Economics, Professor, 経済学部, 教授
IHORI Toshihiro Osaka University, Department of Economics, Associate Professor, 経済学部, 助教授 (40145652)
猪木 武徳 大阪大学, 経済学部, 教授 (00107111)
FUKUSHIMA Takashi Osaka University, Department of Economics, Associate Professor, 経済学部, 助教授 (30228887)
TAKAGI Yuji Osaka University, Department of Economics, Associate Professor, 経済学部, 助教授 (20226749)
MASUZOE Yoichi Political Scientist, 教養学部, 助教授
HATTA Tatsuo Osaka University, Institute of Social Economic Research, Professor, 社会経済研究所, 教授 (70008647)
YASUBA Yasukichi Osaka University, Department of Economics, Professor, 経済学部, 教授 (80028034)
SATO Hideo Tsukuba University, Institute of Social and Economics, Professor, 社会工学系, 教授 (50154084)
PANAGARIYA Arvind University of Maryland, Department of Economics, Professor
CHEW Soo Hong University of California at Irvine, Department of Economics, Professor
HON Sue Soo Government of Korea, Member of Parliament
|Budget Amount *help
¥17,000,000 (Direct Cost: ¥17,000,000)
Fiscal Year 1990: ¥4,000,000 (Direct Cost: ¥4,000,000)
Fiscal Year 1989: ¥7,000,000 (Direct Cost: ¥7,000,000)
Fiscal Year 1988: ¥6,000,000 (Direct Cost: ¥6,000,000)
This project attempts to investigate interrelationship between international trade and international security. The investigators found the need for developing the basic framework of analysis as there are a few theoretical works in this area.
They first developed is a model is which the national security expenditures are compared with the cost of protecting inefficient domestic industries. The reason is that as the defense expenditures would possibly reduce the risk of trade disruption and therefore, the need for protection of inefficient industries would be lessened as the security expenditures are increased. Thus the traditional defense argument for protection must be modified.
The second model compares costs of protecting domestic industries, the costs of stockpiling material in order to meet the period of possible trade disruptions and the cost of security as the way of reducing possibility of trade disruptions.
Thirdly, the project produced a general equilibrium model of two nations security expenditures as a function of availability of arms supply from the rest of the world.
Fourth, it investigate coordinating national defense projects in a two country trade model.
Fifth, it compares the effects of human resource development in armed forces in the U. S. and Japan.
Sixth, it contains a theoretical analysis of food security arguments for protecting agricultural industries.
These are samples of the models developed through this project.