| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
SYLVANO Mahi フィリピン大学, アジアセンター, 助教授
INOUE Makoto Graduated School of Agricultural and Life Sciences The Univeristy of Tokyo, Ass., 大学院・農学生命科学研究科, 助教授 (10232555)
ASAMI Yasuhito Faculty of Sociology, Hitotsubashi University, Ass.Prof., 社会学部, 助教授 (60251500)
NAKANISHI Toru Faculty of Economics, The University of Tokyo, Ass.Prof., 経済学部, 助教授 (30227839)
IKEMOTO Yukio Center for Southeast Asian Sudies, Kyoto University, Ass.Prof., 東南アジア研究センター, 助教授 (20222911)
KIKKAWA Takeo Institute of Social Science, The University of Tokyo, Prof., 社会科学研究所, 教授 (20161507)
FUKUI Seiichi Faculty of Economics, Osaka Gakuin University, Prof., 経済学部, 教授 (90134197)
KAIDA Yoshihiro Center for Southeast Asian Sudies, Kyoto University, Prof., 東南アジア研究センター, 教授 (00026452)
HARA Younosuke Institute of Oriental Culture, The University of Tokyo, Prof., 東洋文化研究所, 教授 (60012986)
MAHIWO Sylvano Asia Center, The University of Philippines, Ass.Prof.
|
|---|
| Research Abstract |
This project was organized by ten scholars who varied in their disciplines from development economics through political economy to forest sociology. Major topics are tow. One is the study of direction of economic development policies and developmental strategies which the governments in Southeast Asia have undertaken, and the other is the study of social response of each country to these government policies. "Developmental strategies" here do include not only industrialization but also promotion of rural development, urban planning and natural resources developement.
initially we presuppose that each countly may show unique pattern of developement due to the differences in social response to "developmental strategies" in the process of transferring to more deepening market economy. According to this hypothesis, our member conducted intensive field research for three years in Southeast Asian countries together with China and Bangladesh.
From these field research, we temporarily conclude that the uniqueness of development in Southeast Asia has been determined by three major elements, that is, (1) ecological factors in general and characteristics of delta formation in particular ; (2) institutional/organizational adjustment of each country to alleviate social conflict stemming from rapid industrialization ; and (3) the role of family and community which support stability and security of social life that the government has hardly touch on. Traditional approach has focussed on rational behavior of individuals and supplemental role of government when arguing economic development. The role of non-governmental institution, however, should not be neglected when discussing both economic growth and social stability.
|
