1997 Fiscal Year Final Research Report Summary
Study on the International Networking for the Newly Emerging Socio-Economic Initiatives : Europe and North-East Asia
Project/Area Number |
07045009
|
Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for international Scientific Research
|
Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
Section | University-to-University Cooperative Research |
Research Field |
経済政策(含経済事情)
|
Research Institution | Ritsumeikan University |
Principal Investigator |
YOSHINARI Taishi Ritsumeikan University, The Institute of International Relations and Areas Studies, Professor, 国際地域研究所, 教授 (50201025)
|
Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
DYKER D. サセックス大学, 欧州学部・政策科学研究所, 教授
WALLACE H. サセックス大学, 欧州研究所, 所長
HAYASHI Kentaro Ritusmeikan University, School of Social Science, Professor, 産業社会学部, 教授 (40066741)
MATSUNO Shuji Ritsumeikan University, School of Economics, Professor, 経済学部, 教授 (10128457)
NISHIGUCHI Kiyokatsu Ritsumeikan University, School of Economics, Professor, 経済学部, 教授 (20039465)
WALLACE Hellen University of Sussex, Sussex European Institute, Director
DYKER David University of Sussex, School of European Studies and SPRU,Professor
|
Project Period (FY) |
1995 – 1997
|
Keywords | International Region / Intellectual Initiative / North-East Asia / Pan Sea of Japan Rim / Transitional Society / Central & Eastern Europe / Linkage of University & Region |
Research Abstract |
As the results of the four workshops (two workshops at Ritsumeikan University in March 1997 and March 1998, and one at University of Sussex in March 1996, and one workshop in Korea, March 1998) which contained 25 papers, and several field studies (in Europe 1996 and in North-East Asia 1997 and 1998), and also intermediate meetings of joint research members, we reached to have four common remarks as follows regarding our joint research purposes : 1) We surveyed varieties of experiences of the technical assistance programs towards transition societies in Central & East Europe countries mainly centered by PHARE or TACIS.Many universities and research institutes had vital roles as international and regional actors for these transitions, especially in the fields of reconstructing institutional infrastructures or revitalizing small and medium farms, yeilding many types of the public and private partnership. 2) On the contrary, in North-East Asia, social transition processes have been rather slow and mild, which have still remained as periphery international regions as before. It means the necessity for the academic initiative all the more because academic infrastructure itself has the feature as the pillar of social transition and also the bridge of intellectual mobility (international exchange, technology transfer, and so on). 3) But present situations of the academic sectors in this regions remain at primitive stage of partial and usually bilateral exchanges among them, which should become keen actor of the social developments or international exchanges with the perspective of international integration in diversities. 4) Current economic crises in East Asia which so instantly converted from 'East Asia Miracle', need the urgent reconstructing of socio-economic institutional systems which will lead the move towards more stable societies. The intellectual initiatives will have indispensable role to these purposes as in Europe.
|