1997 Fiscal Year Final Research Report Summary
System for Implementaion of Urban Planning and the Principle of Urban Planning
| Project/Area Number |
07620019
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Public law
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Ritsumeikan University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
YASUMOTO Norio Ritsumeikan University, Faculty of Law, Professo, 法学部, 教授 (20066723)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
1995 – 1997
|
| Keywords | Urban Planning / Development / Planning Permission / Building Control / Detailed Control / Public Participation / Standing to sue |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
Urban Planning System today is required to be useful for renewal of built areas, coordination with nature and creation of identity for every areas. Therefor it shuould have (l)control of all of the national land, (2)comprehensive control of all of the developments and (3)detailed control enough to create identity of streets.
In Britain they have developed their own discretionary system which they use to make a individual plan for each areas. Its credability is supported by public participation, adoption by councils, profession of planner, open government and appeal and judicial review.
Japanes Planning System has some defects : Town Planning is limited within Town Planning Areas. Town plans are not detailed. Building is not included in the conception of "development". Small develoopments are free from planning control. Officials regard criteria not as those for permission refusal, but as technical standards for developed sites while I am opposed to it.
Local councils do not determine plans and planning permissions. Public participaion is limited in very little opportuinities. Standing to suit is limited narrowly too. But the Environmental Impact Assessment Act is enacted in 1996. We can find the signs of change in the Spreme Court jadgements in recent cases.
|
