• Search Research Projects
  • Search Researchers
  • How to Use
  1. Back to project page

1998 Fiscal Year Final Research Report Summary

Self Evaluation of University-Students'Evaluation of Instructions for Evaluation of Instructors-

Research Project

Project/Area Number 08458030
Research Category

Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)

Allocation TypeSingle-year Grants
Section一般
Research Field Science education
Research InstitutionTokai University

Principal Investigator

YASUOKA Takashi  Tokai University, Faculty of Science, Professor, 理学部, 教授 (90096272)

Project Period (FY) 1996 – 1998
Keywordseducation of university / self check & self evaluation / evaluation of instructor / educational evaluation / property of students'evaluation of instructions / credit / cooperative education / raising of students'self learning ability
Research Abstract

The following were investigated : the items for instructor evaluation, the items for evaluation of education, the content of the evaluation items, the reliability of the evaluation items, the goals of instruction at Tokai University and the evaluation of classroom cooperative methodology. The items of evaluation of instructors are academic and educational achievements, social service, and the carrying out of administrative duties. The ratio of these four items is 40 : 40 : 20 : 20. The ratio is adequate for establishing the quality of a "good" instructor. As regards evaluation of education these are 4 points that were considered : classroom teaching, guiding students in research or thesis work, assisting students in their social life and educational research. The ratio of these 4 items is 60 : 20 : 10 : 10. It is adequate for establishing the quality of a "good" instructor. The result of thee valuation of instruction showed that with the increasing age of instructors the evaluation scores decreased. The evaluation scores differ according to the subject matter taught. More than half of the teachers valued students' evaluations. In the future, since the goals of instruction at Tokai University are to nurture students' critical thinking and problem solving abilities, the items of evaluations should include ones that focus on instructors' efforts to develop students' critical thinking skills. If the evaluation sheets can include the above mentioned items, then they will become the most important data for teacher evaluation.

  • Research Products

    (8 results)

All Other

All Publications (8 results)

  • [Publications] 安岡 高志: "大学教員に何が期待されるか -専門ディシフリンと教養教育-" 一般教育学会誌. 18(2). 37-40 (1996)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(和文)」より
  • [Publications] 安岡 高志 他6名: "学生の授業評価におよぼす教員の年齢の影響" 大学教育学会誌. 19(2). 75-79 (1997)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(和文)」より
  • [Publications] 安岡 高志: "教員評価に関するアンケート調査" 大学教育学会誌. 20(2). 169-176 (1988)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(和文)」より
  • [Publications] 安岡 高志: "東海大学の組織的教育への取り組み" 大学教育学会誌. 21(1)(掲載予定). (1999)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(和文)」より
  • [Publications] Takashi Yasuoka: "What is instructor expected at university?" J.Lib.& Gen Edu.Soc.JP. 18 (2). 37-40 (1996)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(欧文)」より
  • [Publications] Takashi Yasuoka and others: "The effect of instructors'age on the evaluation of their instruction by their students" J.Lib.& Gen Edu.Soc.JP. 19 (2). 75-79 (1997)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(欧文)」より
  • [Publications] Takashi Yasuoka: "Survey research on the evaluation of instructors by questionnaire" J.Lib.& Gen Edu.Soc.JP. 20 (2). 169-176 (1998)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(欧文)」より
  • [Publications] Takashi Yasuoka: "A cooperative effort in a systematic education at Tokai University" J.Lib.& Gen Edu.Soc.JP. 21 (1) (booked). (1999)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(欧文)」より

URL: 

Published: 1999-12-08  

Information User Guide FAQ News Terms of Use Attribution of KAKENHI

Powered by NII kakenhi