• Search Research Projects
  • Search Researchers
  • How to Use
  1. Back to project page

1999 Fiscal Year Final Research Report Summary

Comparative Study on Modal Integration in Transportation

Research Project

Project/Area Number 09044170
Research Category

Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B).

Allocation TypeSingle-year Grants
Section一般
Research Field 交通工学・国土計画
Research InstitutionTottori University

Principal Investigator

OKUYAMA Yasuhide  Tottori University, Faculty of Engineering, Professor, 工学部, 教授 (90204156)

Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) MORIKAWA Takayuki  Nagoya University, Faculty of Engineering, Associate Professor, 工学部, 助教授 (30166392)
FUKUYAMA Kei  Tottori University, Faculty of Engineering, Associate Professor, 工学部, 助教授 (30273882)
KITA Hideyuki  Tottori University, Faculty of Engineering, Professor, 工学部, 教授 (50135521)
HOSOYA Ryouko  Tottori University, Faculty of Engineering, Research Associate, 工学部, 助手 (40294342)
TANIMOTO Keishi  Tottori University, Faculty of Engineering, Research Associate, 工学部, 助手 (20304199)
Project Period (FY) 1997 – 1999
KeywordsIntercity transportation system / Mode integration / Comparative analysis / Local characteristics / Full cost / Comparative advantage
Research Abstract

The aim of this study is to explore the future direction for efficient transportation systems supported by adequate modal coordination, by crossing over the recent researchers on the modal coordination in intercity transportation in California and Japan.
Under the growing socio-economic activities and the progress of transportation technologies, the needs for transportation services has become higher, and must be still high in the future. Transportation system have been developed continuously to satisfy these needs such as shorter travel time, lower travel cost, much more convenience, and less environmental impacts. Intensive investment on the development of most efficient transportation mode is essential to meet these needs. The efficiency of modes in transportation highly depends on the geographic, economic, and social conditions of the region. Therefore, the most efficient mode is not necessarily same in regions. The selected best-fit mode in each region has grown until now, and has … More become a dominant mode which characterize the transportation systems in the region.
Each region has some transportation problem such as road congestion, airport noise, or difficulty to maintain minimum service due to small demand. Sometimes, there exists a limit to meet these problems by making some improvement only on the mode. In such a case, coordinating different modes may be a solution to overcome it under the limited resources and/or environmental restrictions. The so-called "Intermodalism" policy is an expression of it. The major idea of this policy is to provide a rich variety of transport alternatives through a modal competition by raising up the connectivity, coordination, and cooperation between modes. Competitive market carries efficient results in general. However, it is also a well known fact that entrusting only the market mechanism does not always realize the best condition.
Generally, the marginal cost to provide an additional transportation service for newly increased demand is lowest in case of expanding dominant transportation mode than the case of developing minor mode, because of the economy of scale. However, in some cases, such an expansion becomes less efficient rather than expanding minor mode. Congestion at an airport which has no room for expansion is one of the cases. To switch a part of additional demand over another mode may be more efficient by expanding the mode if it is possible within a reasonable cost. A monopoly-like condition, where the most of transportation service is provided by a single mode, lacks flexibility and may carry an inefficiency in the long run.
To avoid such an inefficiency, it is important to organize multi-modal transportation system by coordinating transportation modes in their development and use from a view point of long-range planning. For making it possible, we must clarify many thing s including the image of socially optimized transportation system with modal coordination, the full cost of transportation services, the evolution process of transportation systems, and the behavior of users and transportation companies.
In this study, a comparative study on the transportation systems with different modal structures has been conducted to provide useful information for more effective transportation systems. California and Japan have many common conditions, while on the other hand many different conditions including the structure of modal share in transportation. By making comparison between the transportation systems and the surrounding conditions in both the countries, we explore the subjects mentioned above, especially, theoretical analyses on pathdependency and inefficiency of modal share, intercity travel time comparison, full cost comparison, and others. Less

  • Research Products

    (15 results)

All Other

All Publications (15 results)

  • [Publications] 西浦定継,大西 隆,奥山育英: "バンコク大都市圏の副都心計画地における機能集積からみた都市構造変貌"日本都市計画学会学術研究論文集. 34. 109-114 (1999)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(和文)」より
  • [Publications] H. Kita: "A Model Analysis of Flight Subsidization for Sustaining Local Service"International Symposium on Local Knowledge and Innovation : Enhancing the Substance of Non-Metropolitan Regions. (1999)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(和文)」より
  • [Publications] 喜多秀行,坂田裕彦,吉村 晋: "運航補助による地域航空旅客サービスの改善可能性に関するモデル分析"土木計画学研究・論文集. 16. 195-200 (1999)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(和文)」より
  • [Publications] H. Kita and K. Fukuyama: "A merging-giveway behavior model considering interactions at expressway on-ramps"Transportation and Traffic Theory. 173-187 (1999)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(和文)」より
  • [Publications] 小林潔司,福山 敬,秀島栄三 藤井信行: "過疎地域におけるバスサービスの最適維持方策に関する研究"土木学会論文集. 611/IV-42. 45-56 (1999)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(和文)」より
  • [Publications] Mehmet Ali Tuncer, M. Kurino, and K. Kobayashi: "Network evolution with cost-benefit evaluation rules"Infrastructure Planning Review. 16. 129-138 (1999)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(和文)」より
  • [Publications] 奥村 誠,トゥンチェル・メヒメット・アリ 小林潔司: "都市群モデルによる大規模鉄道網整備便益の動学的分析"都市計画学会論文集. 34. 79-84 (1999)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(和文)」より
  • [Publications] 森川高行,佐々木邦明,山本尚央: "離散連続モデルによる年間観光日数・旅行形態の分析と観光行動の地域差に関する研究"土木学会論文集. IV-618. 61-70 (1999)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(和文)」より
  • [Publications] David Levinson, Adib Kanafani, David Gillen: "Air, high-speed rail, or highway ; a cost comparison in the California corridor"Transportation Quarterly. 53・1. 123-131 (1999)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(和文)」より
  • [Publications] Nilam Bedi, David Gillen: "Assessing the economic value of the transportation network"Transportation Research Record. 1659. 51-57 (1999)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(和文)」より
  • [Publications] H.Kita: "A Model Analysis of Flight Subsidization for Sustaining Local Services"International Symposium on Local Knowledge and Innovation : Enhancing the Substance of Non-Metropolitan Regions. (1999)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(欧文)」より
  • [Publications] H.Kita and K.Fukuyama: "A merging-giveway behavior model considering interactions at expressway on-ramps"Transportation and Traffic Theory. 173-187 (1999)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(欧文)」より
  • [Publications] Mehmet Ali Tuncer, Morimitsu Kurino, and Kiyoshi Kobayashi: "Network evolution with cost-benefit evaluation rules"Infrastructure Planning Review. 16. 129-138 (1999)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(欧文)」より
  • [Publications] David Levinson, Adib Kanafani, and David Gillen: "Air, high-speed rail, or highway ; a cost comparison in the California corridor"Transportation Quarterly. 53・1. 123-131 (1999)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(欧文)」より
  • [Publications] Nilam Bedi, David Gillen: "Assessing the economic value of the transportation network"Transportation Research Record. 1659. 51-57 (1999)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(欧文)」より

URL: 

Published: 2001-10-23  

Information User Guide FAQ News Terms of Use Attribution of KAKENHI

Powered by NII kakenhi