1999 Fiscal Year Final Research Report Summary
A Research in the comparative vocational education system between Japan and Germany
Project/Area Number |
09410069
|
Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
|
Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
Section | 一般 |
Research Field |
Educaion
|
Research Institution | Nagoya University |
Principal Investigator |
TERADA Moriki Nagoya Univ., Faculty of Education, Prof., 教育学部, 教授 (80197805)
|
Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
SAKANO Shinji National Institute for Educational Research, Researcher, 教育経営研究部, 主任研究員 (30235163)
NAGATA Kazuyuki Fukuoka Kyoiku Univ., Faculty of Education, Assc. Prof., 教育学部, 助教授 (70155935)
SHINKAI Hideyuki Nagoya Univ., Faculty of Education, Prof., 教育学部, 教授 (00036055)
YOKOYAMA Etsuo Nagoya Univ., Faculty of Education, Assc. Prof., 教育学部, 助教授 (40210629)
|
Project Period (FY) |
1997 – 1999
|
Keywords | Germany / Japan / Vocational education / Training within firm / special schools / Vocational qualifying system / international comparison |
Research Abstract |
We have tried to compare the Japanese vocational education system with German one's and at the same time we would like to present one comparative model for vocational research. Concretely saying, we have accomplished three tasks, firstly to investigate the relationship between the school vocational education and outside school vocational training including training within firm and to analyze the substantial situations both in Japan and Germany, secondly to clarify the change of vocational education after 1990's, thirdly to construct a new theoretical model for the comparative vocational education. Through our work during these three years, we can point that both countries system fundamentally have been steady though they are very being fall down in the crisis, especially in the field of upper secondly vocational education (vocational course in Japan and dual system in Germany). We estimate that those both crises mean reformation process which face to the comparative quantitative decreasing tendencies of the number of students and to the extensive development toward higher vocational education. At the same time we can insist that our analytical model is so functional and here present a three dimensional comparative model concerning historical development for the vocational education and training.
|