• Search Research Projects
  • Search Researchers
  • How to Use
  1. Back to project page

1999 Fiscal Year Final Research Report Summary

Making of lifewelfare (abundance , living merit) indicator of a community based on subjective valuation of a regional residents.

Research Project

Project/Area Number 09610187
Research Category

Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)

Allocation TypeSingle-year Grants
Section一般
Research Field 社会学(含社会福祉関係)
Research InstitutionHIROSAKI UNIVERSITY (1998-1999)
University of Miyazaki (1997)

Principal Investigator

KAMIYA Kazuo  Hirosaki University, the Faculty of Education, Professor, 教育学部, 教授 (90253814)

Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) 弘前大学, 教育学部, 教授
Project Period (FY) 1997 – 1999
KeywordsABUNDANCE / LIVING MERIT / SUBJECTIVE VALUATION / AHP / COMMUNITY
Research Abstract

1. An aim of this research is to make an indicator of abundance of a community by subjective valuation of a regional residents.
2. Investigative object ground of research was set up in Miyazaki prefecture.
3. An investigative area was divided into three areas of an suburban area, an agricultural area, an hilly and mountainous area based on an agricultural regional type of Miyazaki prefecture.
4. First of all, it was investigated how a regional residents is conscious of abundance.
5. In addition, type dividing of abundance conscious of a regional residents was performed based on the abundance which was gathered by a research and items of abundance was made.
6. The item was divided into " freedom" , " safety-relieved" , " fair" , " comfortable" four sectors and a quetionaire by AHP was made.
7. By the research of AHP, abundance one pair each of item was compaired and it was checked of which item valuation is high.
8. The investigative result was analysed by AHP.
9. Valuation of " safety-relived" item of an investiative analytic result of abundance by AHP was high.
10. In a low-ranking item of "safety relieved" item, it was an item "which" family supports each other and can spend as for the item which is highly evaluated.
11. There is not in only an item such as " freedom" and " safety relieved " which was used this time, and it can be investigated using a distinctive abundance item. Using an item various, by analysing it by AHP, an effective indicator can be made in addition.

  • Research Products

    (4 results)

All Other

All Publications (4 results)

  • [Publications] 神谷一夫: "地域社会による「豊かさ」「住み良さ」の評価"農村生活研究. 41巻3号. 5-12 (1997)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(和文)」より
  • [Publications] 神谷一夫: "地域住民の主観的評価に基づく豊かさ観"九州農村生活研究会会報. 第7号. 36-45 (1998)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(和文)」より
  • [Publications] Kamiya, Kazuo: "Valuation of "abundance", "livingnmerit " by a regional resients."Journal of the Rural Life Society of Japan. Vol.41 No.3. 5-12 (1997)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(欧文)」より
  • [Publications] Kamiya, Kazuo: "A view of abundance based on subjective valuanon of a regional residents."Bulletin of the Rural Life Society o f Kyusyu. No.7. 36-45 (1998)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(欧文)」より

URL: 

Published: 2001-10-23  

Information User Guide FAQ News Terms of Use Attribution of KAKENHI

Powered by NII kakenhi