精神薄弱者更生施設の類型化と知的障害者施設再編成に関する研究

1998 Fiscal Year Final Research Report Summary

• Project/Area Number: 09650672
• Research Category: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
• Allocation Type: Single-year Grants
• Section: 一般
• Research Field: Town planning/Architectural planning
• Research Institution: Oita University
• Principal Investigator: SUZUKI Yoshihiro Oita University, Faculty of Engineering Research Associate, 工学部, 助手 (30244156)
• Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha): KATAOKA Masaki Oita University, Faculty of Engineering Professor, 工学部, 教授 (70038438)
• Project Period (FY): 1997 – 1998
• Keywords: participation in society / normalization / disabled person / intellectual disability / welfare facility / rehabilitation facility / accommodation facility

Research Abstract

The conclusions by surveying to figure out characteristics are as follows.
Large differences between figure of dweller and activity
We can see the many differences between the dweller's characteristics and daily activities. In 16 facilities, 60 % of dweller has severely or severest handicap, in addition to be elderly tendency.
Recently, these facilities are hard to believe as place of training for rehabilitation and passing to residential living".
We couldn't hard to say that those ideal established when low took on don't work on well in these day.
Delay to modify the living environment
We can the situation in facilities that living group consisted of many dwellers hasn't changed for long term in spite of promoting normalization.
Facilities restored recently because of its deterioration with revising areas of room. Otherwise, it doesn't take the situation into consideration.
In general, we couldn't get reached the promotion of living standard.
Congestion of using facilities
There are some plans such as promoting people to retire from facilities and reducing accommodation. But those haven't some reality, and accommodation is increasing in spiraling numbers.
For the purpose of promoting to residential living, "Group Home" and Life Support Center have been settled. "Working Dormitory", base of residential living, was occupied by retirement from other facilities.
In spite of same organizations, it is hard to say that system moving to residential living doesn't work on well.
We should take these into consideration to study on perspective plan of facilities that helps change to appropriate activities and living environment in parallel with research on accommodate facilities to become reality of residential living.
We should present changing image and new additional function of facilities with concern about location.