2002 Fiscal Year Final Research Report Summary
The Reexamination of the Historical Interpretation and the Typological/Structuralist Interpretation in Religious Studies
| Project/Area Number |
12301002
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Religious studies
|
|---|
| Research Institution | The University of Tokyo |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
KANAI Shinji The University of Tokyo GRADUATE SCHOOL OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIOLOGY, Professor, 大学院・人文社会系研究科, 教授 (30114440)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
ICHIKAWA Hiroshi The University of Tokyo GRADUATE SCHOOL OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIOLOGY, Associate Professor, 大学院・人文社会系研究科, 助教授 (20223084)
TSURUOKA Yoshio The University of Tokyo GRADUATE SCHOOL OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIOLOGY, Prefessor, 大学院・人文社会系研究科, 教授 (60180056)
SHIMAZONO Susumu The University of Tokyo GRADUATE SCHOOL OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIOLOGY, Professor, 大学院・人文社会系研究科, 教授 (20143620)
MURAKAMI Koukyou The University of Tokyo GRADUATE SCHOOL OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIOLOGY, Assistant, 大学院・人文社会系研究科, 助手 (40292742)
IKEZAWA Masaru The University of Tokyo GRADUATE SCHOOL OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIOLOGY, Associate Professor, 大学院・人文社会系研究科, 助教授 (90250993)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2000 – 2002
|
| Keywords | RELIGION / PHENOMENOLOGY / HISTORICAL INTERPRETATION / TYPOLOGY / STRUCTURALISM / RELIGIOUS STUDIES / EMPIRICA APPROACH / DIALOGUE |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
This joint research on "The Reexamination of the Historical Interpretation and the Typological/Structuralist In〓〓〓 pretation in Religious Studies" started in 2000 and continued over a three-year period. It involved seven research meetings. The empirical approaches to the religious phenomena, being founded on the historical interpretation of them, go further to describe and analyze them by sociological, psychological, or any other empirical methods. The phenomenological approach is also based on the historical interpretation of the matter, but it took the way to typological and structural understanding and description of the phenomena.We argue thatboth approaches complement each other and both are of vital importance to the proper understanding of religion. Therefore, a dialogue is needed, not antagonism.
|
