• Search Research Projects
  • Search Researchers
  • How to Use
  1. Back to project page

2003 Fiscal Year Final Research Report Summary

Socratic Inquiry in Plato's Early Philosophy : Dialectic Structure and its significance of today

Research Project

Project/Area Number 13610039
Research Category

Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)

Allocation TypeSingle-year Grants
Section一般
Research Field 倫理学
Research InstitutionShizuoka University

Principal Investigator

TANAKA Shinji  Shizuoka University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Associate Professor, 人文学部, 助教授 (50207099)

Project Period (FY) 2001 – 2003
Keywordsaporia / dialogue / Plato / Socrates / virtue / inquiry / concession / naming
Research Abstract

The aim of this research is to expound and examine Socrates' inquiry in Plato's early dialogues and its significance of today. Since Plato's dialogues are not traces of solidary thinking, but movements between Socrates and his interlocutors (and even bystanders), I don't target this research for seeking any doctorines Socrates (or Plato) might have reached. In fact, Socratic inquiries always fall into aporias. If those inquiries focus on logical argumentations, aporias are nothing but plain failures. Aporias in the Socratic dialogues, however, are not mere failures, but worthy of investigation. It is necessary to examine them as essential phase of the Socratic inquiries ; otherwise, movements woven through questions and answers would be reduced to some doctorines, and Socrates would be taken as a bearer of such doctorines. For the reason why dialogues with Socrates is 'a gift of the god' (Apol. 30d7-e1) is that we are released from supposing we 'know something noble and good' (Apol. 21d4) and our insolence. That is, the gift 'Socrates' in Plato's early dialogues consists in depriving us of supposing that we know something. Thus, this research has examined by texts (Reports of this research deals with Laches, Protagoras, Lysis, Gorgias, Republic I and Meno) how and why Socratic inquires fall into aporia, and expounded significance of Socratic aporia.

  • Research Products

    (6 results)

All Other

All Publications (6 results)

  • [Publications] 田中 伸司: "『メノン』篇における探求の端緒-「よく」「正しく」という副詞が描きとるもの"哲学(北海道大学哲学会編). 37. 19-37 (2001)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(和文)」より
  • [Publications] 田中 伸司: "哲学の方法としての「臨床」と「対話」-「聴く」ことの力、医療現場に臨む哲学、対話のアポリア-"哲学(北海道大学哲学会編). 39. 19-40 (2003)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(和文)」より
  • [Publications] 田中 伸司: "他者を問うことをめぐって-古代ギリシャ哲学、とくにプラトンの対話篇から見えてくること-"文化と哲学(静岡大学哲学会編). 20. 51-66 (2003)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(和文)」より
  • [Publications] TANAKA Shinji: "Arche of the Socratic Inquiry in Plato's Meno"TETSUGAKU(Annals of the Philosophical Society of Hokkaido University). 37. 19-37 (2001)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(欧文)」より
  • [Publications] TANAKA Shinji: "'Klinike' and 'Dialektike' as the Method of Philosophy"TETSUGAKU(Annals of the Philosophical Society of Hokkaido University). 39. 19-40 (2003)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(欧文)」より
  • [Publications] TANAKA Shinji: "On the Inquiry for Otherness : Still we can learn form the Greek philosophy, esp. Plato's Dialogues"Journal of Culture and Philosophy (edited by The Society of Philosophy of Shizu oka University). Vol.20. 51-66 (2003)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(欧文)」より

URL: 

Published: 2005-04-19  

Information User Guide FAQ News Terms of Use Attribution of KAKENHI

Powered by NII kakenhi