2004 Fiscal Year Final Research Report Summary
Research on support intervention for malpractice prevention in basic nursing education
| Project/Area Number |
14572223
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
基礎・地域看護学
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Okayama University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
HYODO Yoshimi Okayama University, Department of Medicine, Associate professor, 医学部, 助教授 (90151555)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
IKEDA Toshiko Okayama University, Department of Medicine, Associate professor, 医学部, 助教授 (60202892)
TANAKA Tomoko Okayama University, Department of Literature, Professor, 文学部, 教授 (40227153)
TANAKA Koji Okayama University, Department of Education, Professor, 教育学部, 教授 (00087983)
FUKAI Kiyoko Okayama University, Department of Medicine, Professor, 医学部, 教授 (70104809)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2002 – 2004
|
| Keywords | near accidental experience / human error / single cause / multi cause / precognition of danger / freshman Ns / Lapse / error pattern measure |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
1.2002 : Focusing on the near-accidental experience by trainees during practice, causes of such cases were analyzed through quantitative analysis type III. As a result, the cause are classified into the following four types. 1.Judgement mistake due to characteristics and situation of patients, 2.Mistake due to insufficient knowledge, 3.Lapses, and 4.Slips. The type 2 to 4 may be analogous to human error classification in cognitive psychology, but type 1 is unique in medical practice in particular by trainees.
2.2003 : Based on the results in 2002, quantitative analysis type III was carried out on near-accidental experiences during practice of trainees. The data were collected from the university undergraduates and guraduates. The analyses revealed that the cases are divided into two types : single cause or multi causes. From the results after analyses cases and examples were assumed, and countermeasures were worked out.
3.2004 : Freshman nurses were examined through interview. Near-accidental experience during the first 6 months as a freshman were interviewed. Quantitative analysis type III were given on cases associated with human errors during medical practice. It is realized that questionnaires designed for lapse was unsuitable to examine the relation between precognition of danger and error pattern of students as error pattern measures were inappropriate for student (trainee) behavior. New error pattern measures were designed for students.
|
