2005 Fiscal Year Final Research Report Summary
An interaction between movement change and mental transfiguration in motor skill learning
| Project/Area Number |
14580027
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
体育学
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Aichi University of Education |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
TSUTSUI Seijiro Aichi University of Education, Faculty of Education, Professor, 教育学部, 教授 (00175465)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2002 – 2005
|
| Keywords | bimanual coordination / contextual interference / observational learning / learning model / random practice / self educational ability / self-regulated learning / motor learning |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
1)In basketball class in the elementary school, analysis of ball trace at both the first and the final days showed that an inactive girl moved only around midfield of a court at the first day and moved all court at the final day because of both a well designed original rule and help by teammates. A skilled boy decreased the number of dribbling a ball and increased the number of passing a ball. Therefore he became to play a basketball game with awareness of teamwork
2)In physical education class in the university, learners acquired not only a motor skill but also perceived ability, intellectual curiosity and body awareness although they spent more time in order to acquire the skill by the method that they repeated try-and-error and found their problems and solutions by themselves.
3)A random practice schedule for kindergartners was effective for not only visual-manual coordination skill task but also body movement task.
4)First, the learning model, rather than the expert model, may be effective as a suitable model when the concentrated practice, rather than the alternative practice, is employed as the learning schedule for observational learning. Therefore the observing the problem-solving processes experienced by the learning model is greatly more effective than observing excellent performance repeatedly presented by the expert model on the coordination learning. Second, The subject-controlled KR group was significantly better than both the 100% KR and the yoked KR groups. Therefore the subject-controlled KR is effective not because KR was provided with less frequency but rather because KR was provided according to subjects' request. Finally, a self-regulated learning schedule was less effective than random practice schedule.
|
