2007 Fiscal Year Final Research Report Summary
Research of institution building and evaluation on decentralization in developing munhies
Project/Area Number |
17201049
|
Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A)
|
Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
Section | 一般 |
Research Field |
Area studies
|
Research Institution | Kobe University |
Principal Investigator |
MATSUNAMI Jun Kobe University, Graduate School of International Cooperation, Professor (70268217)
|
Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
NAGAI Fumio Osaka City University, Faculty of law, Professor (10281106)
TOSA Hiroyuki Kobe University, Graduate School of International Cooperation, Professor (70180148)
KANEKO Yuka Kobe University, Graduate School of International Coopenition, Professor (10291981)
SHIRAISHI Takashi National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies, 政策研究科, Professor (40092241)
KAGAWA Kozo Osaka Jogakuin University, Faculty of International and English Studies, Professor (20019087)
|
Project Period (FY) |
2005 – 2007
|
Keywords | Decentralization / Multi-national / Local economy / Local government / Local finance / International aid |
Research Abstract |
1) Decentralization used as a magic word meaning reform vaguely, according from political science and public administration study. There are cases that decentralization reform unrelated to a policy objective or disregarded the political and economical context. Thus, minus sides and side effects of decentralization have been seen in many cases. However, decentralization reform may activate local_politics in an area and pluralize power. 2) The influence of decentralization reform is seen in regional economy, according to economic analysis. Particularly, in investment, decentralization causes the situation where the conditions of investment are different within one country. There are areas, where decentralization in investment introduced by decentralization increase foreign investment; and there are areas where foreign investment were decreased because of local political decomposition and local regulation. Also in the small and medium-sized enterprises which domestic context influences more, the influence of decentralization is clearly seen. 3) Law studies also saw points 1)and 2). Particularly, we saw decentralization of investment-related regulation and active enactment on local politics. 4) However, the evaluation of decentralization has not yet established. Because 1) decentralization itself has been politically regarded as a right policy regardless of its content, 2) decentralization is, in reality, one of many factors which may affect policy results, and 3) we have not seen the results in each policy areas, we have not yet found the established way to evaluate decentralization.
|
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
[Journal Article] Gurobaru na Tochisei
Author(s)
Hiroyuki, Tosa
-
Journal Title
Kazumi, Takakuwa, et. al. (eds.) Fuko no Ato de, Keio Gijuku Daigaku Shuppankai Tohoku Daigaku Shuppankai
Description
「研究成果報告書概要(欧文)」より
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
[Book] 『大都市のあゆみ』2006
Author(s)
松並 潤(分担執筆)
Total Pages
431
Publisher
東京市政調査会
Description
「研究成果報告書概要(和文)」より
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-