2006 Fiscal Year Final Research Report Summary
Development and Practical Application of A Teaching Plan Authoring System
| Project/Area Number |
17500636
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Educational technology
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Shiga University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
IWAI Kenichi Shiga University, Faculty of Education, Associate Professor, 教育学部, 助教授 (80273390)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2005 – 2006
|
| Keywords | Teaching Plan / authoring system / metadata / XML / Ontology / Web Application |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
I have studied about the following subjects for the past two years.
1.Reinforcement of the authoring system for teaching plans
I have built an authoring system for teaching plans. Since the system is small-scale, it often occurs to hang up and so on. So, I need to reinforce the system by changing from small-scale to middle-scale (especially, RAM size and CPU speed of the system), and by refactoring the system (for stabilizing the system as a web application with multi-user and multi-task functions).
2.Decision of a general format for several teaching plans
We can refer to several teaching plans written by many teachers. However we have not decided one general format for the teaching plans, so we have to do the format for sharing the teaching plans on WWW.
First of all, I have investigated several formats of the teaching plans, and have extracted some candidates for the general format, then tried to improve the formats by using them. As a result, I could select the best candidate, This format is available in several subjects.
3.Introduction of preference information of instructional stages
I have investigated about preferences of contents of teaching plans written by teachers on the system. I named this preference "instructional stages preference information." By using this information, we (including beginners) will be able to know some inherent intention in each teaching plan.
4.Evaluation and future course of the system
I could know the system was useful with evaluations of the system from users, school teachers and expert of educational engineering, and could find a future course of the system.
|
