2007 Fiscal Year Final Research Report Summary
Research of Class Evaluation Investigation that Supports Growth of Teacher of University
| Project/Area Number |
18500736
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Educational technology
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Waseda University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
MIO Tadao Waseda University, Faculty of Education and Integrated Arts and Sciences, Professor (20219596)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
NAGASHIMA Hitonori Waseda University, Faculty of Education and Integrated Arts and Sciences, Professor (00298449)
KIKUCHI Eiji Waseda University, Faculty of Education and Integrated Arts and Sciences, Associate Professor (10211872)
NANBU Masatoshi Joetsu University of Education, Center for Educational Research and Development, Professor (90143627)
URANO Hiroshi Akita University, Faculty of Education and Human Studies, Professor (50185089)
HATANO Kazuhiko National Institute of Multimedia Education, Research and Development Department, Associate Professor (50198751)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2006 – 2007
|
| Keywords | Educational Education / Class Improvement / Higher Education / Class Evaluation / Daifuku-cho / Teacher Growth / Faculty Development |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
The difference between the perception about the present state of affairs and the problem consideration arranged how the teacher of the university grew up as those who taught it by individual's seeing the class and. investigating the class evaluation in the following points for practice by those who taught it who were the person in charge of the subject of a certain. teacher-training course arranged the case in the effect of giving it.
1.Effect on class improvement of accumulation to make teaching portfolio Those who taught it recognized the viewpoint of a high class improvement of concreteness or more by exchanging making to the electron and that of the material of a lecture, related material of the result, the class evaluation investigation result(summary), and the facilities equipment(The photograph is included) among those who taught it, and it was possible to try actually. Moreover, it was effective to a more appropriate method and making the standard by exchanging these information on the evaluation of learning results.
2. The class evaluation investigation and usual Mio, the southern part, Urano, and Hatano by the mark sheet analyzed Mio and Hatano by the adult number class(250 people 100) about the understanding of student's course content, how to catch the class method, and the tendency to the those who taught it comment on the content of the description of the declaration of the greediness for learning and the attitude and participants with a shuttle card(account book). As for the those who teach it comment, it differs and certain has been understood from the history as the class person's teacher the quality and the amount of the content. Those who teach it by the experience of the teacher of primary and the secondary education before have understood the comment to which more educational consideration is abundant is returned to the student, and the amount of the character is also large.
|
Research Products
(9 results)
