2023 Fiscal Year Final Research Report
Reexamination of the nature and function of appeals against administrative actions
Project/Area Number |
19K01278
|
Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
Section | 一般 |
Review Section |
Basic Section 05020:Public law-related
|
Research Institution | Takaoka University of Law |
Principal Investigator |
|
Project Period (FY) |
2019-04-01 – 2024-03-31
|
Keywords | 抗告訴訟 / 直接攻撃型訴訟 / 行為訴訟 / 客観的適法性審査機能 / 行政処分 / 美濃部達吉 / 田中二郎 / 行政事件訴訟法 |
Outline of Final Research Achievements |
In this study, we focus on the fact that the original form of appeal lawsuits against administrativ actions are not lawsuits related to rights but are direct attack lawsuits aimed at canceling administrative actions, and from the viewpoint that they should emphasize the objective legality review function of administrative activities, we reexamine the development of academic theories and litigation systems of "appeal lawsuits against administrativ actions" in Japan. Appeal lawsuits in Japan were lawsuits that combined the official force of administrative actions and gave administrative power the upper hand, but academic reflection on this has led to the view that they are similar to party lawsuits (lawsuits related to rights). However, we have considered the possibility that appeal lawsuits against administrativ actions should be considered in light of the objective legality review function of the direct attack lawsuits.
|
Free Research Field |
行政法学
|
Academic Significance and Societal Importance of the Research Achievements |
公権力の行使に対する行政訴訟(抗告訴訟)は、違法な行政処分の取消を目的とする訴訟であって、通常の民事訴訟のように原告にある給付を命じる訴訟(例えば100万円支払えという判決)ではない。このような訴訟を行政処分に対する直接攻撃型訴訟(行為訴訟)というが、それは原告の権利利益の保護だけでなく、行政活動の違法性を客観的に審査し、違法であれば行政処分を取消すという客観的適法性審査機能を持つ。本研究は、我が国の抗告訴訟をめぐる学説及び訴訟制度の展開を踏まえ、抗告訴訟の客観的適法性審査機能を十分に踏まえた行政事件訴訟法理解が重要であることを示した。、
|