2022 Fiscal Year Final Research Report
Japan-Korea comparative study of the law, system, administration and finance on the progressive introduction of free education at higher education
| Project/Area Number |
19K02864
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Review Section |
Basic Section 09050:Tertiary education-related
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Osaka Seikei University (2020-2022)
Kobe University (2019) |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
WATANABE Akio 大阪成蹊大学, 教育学部, 教授 (20158611)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2019-04-01 – 2023-03-31
|
| Keywords | 教育への権利／高等教育への権利 / 経済的負担軽減・修学支援政策（国） / 子育て教育費支援施策（自治体） / 登録金半額化（韓国） / 漸進的無償化（日本） / 日韓比較研究／日韓韓日対話企画 / 「法規範⇒意思決定⇒制度・行財政＝政策転換」仮説 / 「漸進的無償化プログラム」による見える化 |
|---|
| Outline of Final Research Achievements |
In higher education, Japan and South Korea have been categorized as countries with "high tuition and low subsidies," but both countries have been changing since 2012. The process was read in terms of the hypothesis of "legal norms (right to education in the Constitution, equal opportunity in education in the Basic Law, and progressive free education in the Treaty) ⇒ decision-making ⇒ institutional and administrative finance ⇒ policy change". The 2012 presidential election pledge to halve registration fees (South Korea) and the 2017 general election pledge to make higher education free (Japan) both appeared to be decision-making by the top administration. However, in South Korea, the development of a movement by democratization forces for education since the 1980s, and in Japan, the formation of public opinion by the students involved in the Corona disaster, were behind the implementation of financial burden reduction and emergency support measures based on legal norms.
|
| Free Research Field |
教育学
|
| Academic Significance and Societal Importance of the Research Achievements |
教育無償化を漸進的に進めるにはトータルな枠組みに立った計画の立案・策定が必要である。独自開発した「漸進的無償化プログラム（高等教育版）2017」は、縦軸に「A学費、B奨学金・学生ローン等、C修学（学習）支援、D就労支援・生活保障」を、横軸に「国、都道府県、市町村、学校法人・大学法人、民間」を設けている。それを今回は、高校教育段階を含めた自治体施策の見える化（鳥取県・滋賀県・大阪府）、コロナ禍の緊急支援策を含む日韓動向の見える化に用いた。見える化によって比較検討が容易になり、政策・施策・事業の展開や過不足、特徴や課題の把握が進むツールとして、有効かつ意義のあることが示唆された。
|
