2022 Fiscal Year Final Research Report
Research about the theory to expand the range of person who receives criminal punishment.
Project/Area Number |
20K13352
|
Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Early-Career Scientists
|
Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
Review Section |
Basic Section 05050:Criminal law-related
|
Research Institution | Seiwa University |
Principal Investigator |
|
Project Period (FY) |
2020-04-01 – 2023-03-31
|
Keywords | 共犯体系 / 統一的正犯体系 / 従犯 / 援助正犯 / 幇助行為 / 共犯の処罰根拠 |
Outline of Final Research Achievements |
This research project, mainly (1) analyzes the character of accessory as indirect cause of crime by comparing the two legislating models of complicity (restrictive principal model and unified principal model), and draws conclusions that (2) it is necessary to focus on how the principal accepted the accessory’s contribution to accomplish crime for identifying accessory’s punishable act, (3) the accessory themselves (same as the principal) actually cause the result that is specified in specific moment and scale is the ground of accessory’s punishment. Though I also researched the meaning of “negligence” in the context how it becomes the ground of punishment of legal entity, I would like to continuously make efforts for pronouncing this research outcome.
|
Free Research Field |
刑事法学
|
Academic Significance and Societal Importance of the Research Achievements |
従犯の意義に関し判例・通説が採る促進関係説の論理からは、結果の現実の間接惹起がなく、その危険が認められるにとどまる場合でも従犯として処罰されるおそれが生じる。これに対し、本研究によって精緻化した結果の不良変更という基準により、間接惹起の危険では処罰根拠として充分でないことを明晰化でき、また、処罰されるべき従犯の範囲を精確に基礎づけることができると考えられる。また、この考えは、限縮的正犯概念と統一的正犯体系の違いによらず妥当するとの知見を得た。これらの点に、本研究課題の学術的・社会的意義を見出し得る。
|