2018 Fiscal Year Final Research Report
A study on the development from the rule of Yokunen Shougen in the original text of Zuo shi Zhuan to the rule of enthronement in January of the New Year in Chun qiu Jing and on the school of Chun qiu.
Project/Area Number |
25370041
|
Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
Section | 一般 |
Research Field |
Chinese philosophy/Indian philosophy/Buddhist studies
|
Research Institution | Akita University |
Principal Investigator |
|
Project Period (FY) |
2013-04-01 – 2019-03-31
|
Keywords | 原左氏伝からの春秋左氏経・左氏伝の成立 / 左氏伝:Zhuo shi Zhuan / 春秋経:Chun qiu Jing / 経学的視点のコペルニクス的転換 / 全春秋経文の四種類型文への分類 / 全左伝文の列国史・評言・凡例・解経文への分類 / 踰年称元・正月即位という「名」 / 華夷史観・循環史観・名教史観からなる経学史観 |
Outline of Final Research Achievements |
Zuo shi Zhuan is generally regarded as the text of explication for Chun qiu Zuo shi Jing. But,if we could exclude the sentennces of note on Chun qiu Zuo shi Jing and added Zhuan from the text of Zuo shi Zhuan,the rest of the text can be regarded as the original text of Zuo shi Zhuan. Therefore,I have presented a hypothesis that Chun qiu Zuo shi Jing was edited from the original text of Zuo shi Zhuan by the method of extraction and production,at the same time the editor put the sentences of note on Chun qiu Zuo shi Jing and added Zhuan in The original text of Zuo shi Zhuan,here had become the text of Zuo shi Zhuan that can be regarded as an original form of the present text of Zuo Zhuan.This point of view stands on the standpoint where is an about turn like as Copernics from that of common view. This study has systematically provided the theory and view that the school of Chunqiu according to the historybooks of the nations had composed those three Chunqiu texts in the 4th century BC.
|
Free Research Field |
中国哲学
|
Academic Significance and Societal Importance of the Research Achievements |
本研究は、従来の春秋経からの注釈としての左伝の成立という経学的通説の視点をコペルニクス的に転換し、原左氏伝→春秋経・左氏伝→春秋経(穀・公型)との斬新な仮説を論証し、その形成過程において中国文明の経学史観と称すべき歴史観が成立したことを明らかにする。 その経学史観は、本研究の考察の示すように、中国が夷狄を支配するという華夷史観、王朝交代は天の暦数の循環のように循環的に為されるという循環史観、名を立て、その名によりて裁き、その名が実を生ずという名の論理による名教史観、という三つの下位史観から構成されている。 この経学史観が現代中国に至るまでの中国文明の歴史観の淵源であることを明らかにしている。
|