2017 Fiscal Year Final Research Report
Development and verification of the interprofessional educational method and the performance evaluation criterion in a period of reducing public finance
| Project/Area Number |
25463296
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Fundamental nursing
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Shinshu University (2015-2017)
Nagoya University (2013-2014) |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
aida nobuko 信州大学, 学術研究院保健学系, 教授 (80291863)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Renkei-kenkyūsha) |
HANYA Manako 名城大学, 薬学部, 准教授 (40298568)
ABE Keiko 愛知医科大学, 看護学部, 教授 (00444274)
UEMURA Kazumasa 愛知淑徳大学, 健康医療科学部, 教授 (40303630)
|
|---|
| Research Collaborator |
MATSUI Hitomi 信州大学, 学術研究院保健学系, 助教 (30569570)
KATO Yoshiko 信州大学, 学術研究院人間科学系, 高等教育研究センター, 准教授 (90434969)
YASUI Hiroki 美幌町立国民兼句保険病院, 呼吸器内科, 部長 (20362353)
KAWACHI Miki 名古屋大学, 医学部附属病院看護部, 看護師
MIYOSHI Sachi 名古屋市立大学, 病院看護部, 看護師
YAMAZAKI Koto 名古屋大学, 医学部附属病院看護部, 看護師
YAMASHITA Mai 名古屋大学, 医学部附属病院看護部, 看護師
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2013-04-01 – 2018-03-31
|
| Keywords | 協同学習 / アクティブラーニング / パフォーマンス評価 / ルーブリック |
|---|
| Outline of Final Research Achievements |
Aim 1: Cooperative learning experiences in high school, social support, styles of handling interpersonal conflicts, and undervaluing others in regard to assumed competence were significant influencing factors of the cooperative work recognition scale in the 131 university students. Communication ability and past negative experiences may have an effect on recognition of cooperative work, suggesting the need for continued investigation of the nature of cooperative learning.
Aim 2: Devised and examined the reliability and validity of the TEAM-P2016v rubric designed to evaluate the teaming process of university students participating in cooperative learning.The inter-rater reliability intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.792, the generalizability coefficient was 0.8197, the alpha coefficient of reliability was 0.882. Despite residual issues with criterion-related validity, the TEAM-P2016v trial version was considered applicable as an evaluation index of teaming process performance.
|
| Free Research Field |
老年看護学
|
