Grant-in-Aid for international Scientific Research
|Allocation Type||Single-year Grants|
|Section||University-to-University Cooperative Research|
|Research Institution||Nagasaki University|
YAGI Tuneo Nagasaki University, Faculty of Fisheries, 水産学部, 教授 (20041725)
YU Dong Un Pusan Fisheries University, 資源経済学科, 副教授
李 承来 釜山水産大学校, 資源経済学科, 副教授
崔 鎮浩 釜山水産大学校, 食品栄養学科, 副教授
崔 正ゆん 釜山水産大学校, 水産経営学科, 副教授
朴 九乗 釜山水産大学校, 資源経済学科, 教授
TACHIBANA Katuyasu Nagasaki University, Faculty of Fisheries, 水産学部, 助教授 (20171712)
HAMADA Eiji Tokyo University of Fisheries, 資源管理学科, 助教授 (80172972)
IDE Yoshinori Nagasaki University, College of Commerce, 商科短期大学部, 教授 (20136691)
TUCHIMOTO Mutuyoshi Nagasaki University, Faculty of Fisheries, 水産学部, 教授 (20080525)
LEE Sung Rae Pusan Fisheries University
CHAL Jin Ho Pusan Fisheries University
CHAI Jung Yun Pusan Fisheries University
PARK Ku Byoung Pusan Fisheries University
崔 正銃 釜山水産大学校, 水産経営学科, 副教授
〓 東運 釜山水産大学校, 資源経済学科, 副教授
赤枝 宏 長崎大学, 水産学部, 助教授 (70136638)
|Project Period (FY)
1989 – 1991
Completed(Fiscal Year 1991)
|Budget Amount *help
¥6,000,000 (Direct Cost : ¥6,000,000)
Fiscal Year 1991 : ¥2,000,000 (Direct Cost : ¥2,000,000)
Fiscal Year 1990 : ¥2,000,000 (Direct Cost : ¥2,000,000)
Fiscal Year 1989 : ¥2,000,000 (Direct Cost : ¥2,000,000)
|Keywords||bearer of production / overproduction / processing / security of foods / co-oreratives / 陸上養殖 / 複合養殖 / 予約相対取引 / 容存酸素 / 「漁場の天気予報」システム|
This comparative study of Japanese and Korean aquaculture for three years was very significant. As the result of this study we had common recognition as follows.
Firstly, we found that the bearers of the aquaculture are different between Japan and Korea. In Japan, they are fishermen of coastal fishery. In Korea, aquaculture are bore by the big business.
Secondly, it became clear for us all that Japan has the overproduction problem of cultured fishes and many devices are made for the effective circulation them. On the other hand, although Korea is not confronted with such problems yet, we all recognized that Korea will have the same problems soon. So it will necessary for Korea to have the same devices for the effective circulation of cultured fishes as Japan.
Thirdly, we found big differences between Japanese fisheries co-operatives and Korean ones. In Japan, although they still have many problems, fisheries co-operatives are carrying out selling, purchasing, financing, etc. as general co-operatives. But, in Korea, their management are biased to fainancing. So we had common recognition that Korean fisheries-cooperatives have to reexamine the role of themselves and to improve their organization to be truely useful for Korean coastal fishermen.
Furthermore, as the result of consumer's market investigation, we noticed that it is very important for producer to consider the change of consumer's awareness. Because consumers are becoming to respond to the safety of foods.
Finally, we would like to conclude this study report to express that it is very important to deepen the interchange between Japan and Korea and to exchange information for the sound development of aquaculture in both countries.