• Search Research Projects
  • Search Researchers
  • How to Use
  1. Back to previous page

A STUDY OF THE FORMATION OF SPINOZA'S PHILOSOPHY PRINCIPALLY BASED ON HISTORICAL, PHILOLOGICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES ON THE SHORT TREATISE

Research Project

Project/Area Number 11610006
Research Category

Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)

Allocation TypeSingle-year Grants
Section一般
Research Field Philosophy
Research InstitutionUNIVERSITY OF YAMANASHI

Principal Investigator

SATO Ichiro  UNIVERSITY OF YAMANASHI, FACULTY OF EDUCATION & HUMAN SCIENCES, 教育人間科学部, 助教授 (80178706)

Project Period (FY) 1999 – 2002
Project Status Completed (Fiscal Year 2002)
Budget Amount *help
¥3,800,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,800,000)
Fiscal Year 2002: ¥300,000 (Direct Cost: ¥300,000)
Fiscal Year 2001: ¥1,400,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,400,000)
Fiscal Year 2000: ¥1,400,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,400,000)
Fiscal Year 1999: ¥700,000 (Direct Cost: ¥700,000)
KeywordsSpinoza / Short Treatise / Microfilms of codices / The Ethics / Treatise of the improvement of Understanding / Truth / 原典写本 / 神の存在のアポステリオリな証明 / オランダ語
Research Abstract

The Short Treatise on God, Man and His Well-being (hereafter Short Treatise) of Spinoza is famous of its special difficulty in reading of the text. I have done philological research on it through reading of its text with reference to codices the microfilms of which we got and also through comparing various editions. I have been engaged in the translation of this work for several years. Coincided with this translation work and with analytical reading of it, I have carried philosophical investigations into the relation of this work to the Ethics and to Treatise on the improvement of Understanding (hereafter TIE) depended on basic works of the understanding of historiography and of the review of main interpretations. And from a view of the making of Spinoza's early philosophy, I have tried to investigate historically into the facts, circumstances, the period of writing this work and its original form (in which language? And by dictation or not). Consequently I could get mainly the followi … More ng results.
1. Through attention to what sort of work the Short Treatise had been accepted as, I think, I could clarify to some extent some particular circumstances attached to this work, including the relation with the Ethics as completed form.
2. Recent tendencies of Spinozistic studies have come to attach great importance to his early philosophy. There lies a crucial problem about the chronological order between TIE and Short Treatise. However, historical approach to this problem cannot be separated from insights into philosophies lying in them. This has become concretely clear to me through tracing his philosophy on truth I have been mainly engaged in the latter half of the term of this project. In particular, I have come to an idea that the incomplete TIE (together with why it was remained incomplete) has so much significance in his making of own philosophy.
3. To speak incidentally, on grant-in-aid in terms of this project, I could make research trip in the Netherlands and Italy and have my research project reviewed by leading scholars in history of ideas and historico-philological study respectively. It was, of course, of great significance in widening my vision of study. Less

Report

(5 results)
  • 2002 Annual Research Report   Final Research Report Summary
  • 2001 Annual Research Report
  • 2000 Annual Research Report
  • 1999 Annual Research Report
  • Research Products

    (12 results)

All Other

All Publications (12 results)

  • [Publications] 佐藤一郎: "スピノザ『短論文』をめぐる事実と仮説(一)"山梨大学教育人間科学部紀要. 1巻1号. 33-40 (1999)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(和文)」より
    • Related Report
      2002 Final Research Report Summary
  • [Publications] 佐藤一郎: "『短論文』のいくつかの問題から-歴史的問題を中心に-"スピノザ協会会報. 第33号. 5-8 (2000)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(和文)」より
    • Related Report
      2002 Final Research Report Summary
  • [Publications] 佐藤一郎: "第四種認識は科学原理か個物知かという疑問を中心に"スピノザーナ. 4号(未定). (2003)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(和文)」より
    • Related Report
      2002 Final Research Report Summary
  • [Publications] 佐藤一郎: "スピノザと真理 序説-「エチカ」まで-"フランス哲学・思想研究. 第8号(未定). (2003)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(和文)」より
    • Related Report
      2002 Final Research Report Summary
  • [Publications] Sato, Ichiro: "Facts and hypotheses about The Short Treatise of Spinoza"Kiyo, Faculty of Education & Human Sciences. Vol.1, No.1. 33-40 (1999)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(欧文)」より
    • Related Report
      2002 Final Research Report Summary
  • [Publications] Sato, Ichiro: "Some Problems on The Short Treatise - Based on Historical Problems -"Spinoza Kyokai Bulletin. No.33. 5-8 (2000)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(欧文)」より
    • Related Report
      2002 Final Research Report Summary
  • [Publications] Sato, Ichiro: "Question "Is the Fourth Kind of Knowledge Scientific Principles or the Knowledge of Particular Things?""Spinozana. Vol.4. (2003)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(欧文)」より
    • Related Report
      2002 Final Research Report Summary
  • [Publications] Sato, Ichiro: "Spinoza and Truth ; An introduction - to The Ethics -"Revue de Philosophie Frangaise. No.8. (2003)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(欧文)」より
    • Related Report
      2002 Final Research Report Summary
  • [Publications] 佐藤一郎: "第四種認識は科学原理か個物知かという疑問を中心に"スピノザーナ. 4号. (2003)

    • Related Report
      2002 Annual Research Report
  • [Publications] 佐藤一郎: "スピノザと真理 序説-「エチカ」まで-"フランス哲学・思想研究. 第8号. (2003)

    • Related Report
      2002 Annual Research Report
  • [Publications] 佐藤一郎: "『短論文』のいくつかの問題から-歴史的問題を中心に-"スピノザ協会会報. 33号. 5-8 (2000)

    • Related Report
      2000 Annual Research Report
  • [Publications] 佐藤一郎: "スピノザ『短論文』をめぐる事実と仮説(一)"山梨大学教育人間科学部紀要. 1巻・1号. 33-40 (1999)

    • Related Report
      1999 Annual Research Report

URL: 

Published: 1999-04-01   Modified: 2016-04-21  

Information User Guide FAQ News Terms of Use Attribution of KAKENHI

Powered by NII kakenhi