| Budget Amount *help |
¥3,600,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,600,000)
Fiscal Year 2002: ¥500,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000)
Fiscal Year 2001: ¥800,000 (Direct Cost: ¥800,000)
Fiscal Year 2000: ¥1,100,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,100,000)
Fiscal Year 1999: ¥1,200,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,200,000)
|
|---|
| Research Abstract |
In this four-year study, at first, I examined Hamaguchi's national design and hispolicy in the time of Showa economic panic, with the development of nternational relation and domestic politics of those days. At that time, the most important problem was the economic policy at the panic after lifting the gold embargo, London navy disarmament treaty and foreign policy to China.
About the panic that Hamaguchi watched it was a economic panic of general irculation type and did usual recession measures, so he was going to maintain the he gold standard and a curtailed budget.
An opinion that the London navy disarmament treaty problem became the beginning of the later public opinion division is often watched, but, actually, naval disarmament objection group is expelled from the navy nucleus. Control of government by an assembly political party was strengthened.
Hamaguchi cabinet, in the time of the panic, adopted cooperation with America and Britain and noninterference to the Chinese domestic admi
… More
nistration as a basis of foreign policy. Hamaguchi himself thought that cooperation was possible with China nation government in addition to America and Britain. The American overnment, the British government were manner of cooperation basically in a amaguchi cabinet, too. American correspondence in London navy disarmament conference is favorable for a Hamaguchi cabinet. The China nation government advocated 'revolutional diplomacy' formally, but I was cautious of military intervention by Japan, and, actually, the policy to Japan was extremely cautious, and A Hamaguchi cabinet is preferable for them.
The state that may say tdivision of public opinion occurs from Manchurian Incident front and back and this is not from a disarmament treaty problem and gets into it stride from friction in the army part, rise of an ultranationalism group around Nagata Tetuzan in the place. The investigation of national design and politics action of Nagata were significant for that I made this process clear.
The national design of Nagata was to prepare for the next Great War from 'Total War' stage recognition and, from the viewpoint of resources security to national general mobilization preparations. He was going to put Northeast China and north China with that purpose under Japanese rule. And he thought about national remodeling with that purpose. A panic becomes intensified, and Nagata starts realization of the design. Less
|
