Project/Area Number |
12650004
|
Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
Section | 一般 |
Research Field |
Applied materials science/Crystal engineering
|
Research Institution | The University of Tokyo |
Principal Investigator |
SAITO Toshio University of Tokyo, CCR, Research associate, 国際・産学共同研究センター, 助手 (90170513)
|
Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
ARAKAWA Yasuhiko University of Tokyo, RCAST, Professor, 先端科学技術研究センター, 教授 (30134638)
|
Project Period (FY) |
2000 – 2001
|
Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2001)
|
Budget Amount *help |
¥2,500,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,500,000)
Fiscal Year 2001: ¥800,000 (Direct Cost: ¥800,000)
Fiscal Year 2000: ¥1,700,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,700,000)
|
Keywords | GaN / lnGaN / quantum dot / electronic structure / fight-binding method / piezoelectric effect / Stark effect / wave function overlap |
Research Abstract |
We have analyzed the electronic structures of ln_<0.2>Ga_<0.8>N pyramidal quantum dots (QDs) in a GaN barrier layer using a polarization-potential dependent sp^3 tight-binding method. A valence-force-field method using the Keating potential was used for the strain and atom-position calculations. For the QD with the diameter 86.4 A, height of 20.8 A, and facet inclination angle of 30 degree, the maximum piezoelectric field is calculated to be1.64 MV/cm. The energy gap shows a red shift of 0.100 eV due to the quantum-confined Stark effect. The field causes a spatial separation of the electron and hole wave functions in the QD. The number of electron-hole pairs, which can screen the field totally, is estimated as a function of the diameter. We find that 13 electron-hole pairs are required for the complete field screening for the QD with the diameter 86.4 A. In experiments by Damilano et al., the photoluminescence peak energy, E_<PL>, of 2.71 eV (at room temperature) was measured for the MBE-grown In_<0.2>Ga_<0.8>N QDs with the similar QD size ; diameter = 100 A, heitht = 20 A. Eg = 2.706 eV for the pyramidal QD is in better agreement with the measured energy, E_<PL> = 2.71 eV, than Eg = 2.502 eV for the prismatic QD.
|