Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
|Allocation Type||Single-year Grants|
|Research Institution||Nagasaki University|
ONO Takahiro Nagasaki University, Faculty of Environmental Studies, Professor, 環境科学部, 教授 (60108628)
UETA Kazuhiro Kyoto University, Graduate School of Economics, Professor, 大学院・経済学研究科, 教授 (20144397)
WADA Naohisa SAKUSINGAKUIN University, Faculty of Regional Development, Professor, 地域発展学部, 教授 (30264683)
YAMAKAWA Hajime Kyoto Prefectural University, Faculty of Human Eivironment, Lecturer, 人間環境学部, 講師 (10295636)
OKADA Hiromasa Nagasaki University, Faculty of Economics, Professor, 経済学部, 教授 (40201983)
OKU Mami Nagasaki University, Faculty of Environmental Studies, Associate Professor, 環境科学部, 助教授 (30304968)
|Project Period (FY)
2002 – 2004
Completed(Fiscal Year 2004)
|Budget Amount *help
¥14,200,000 (Direct Cost : ¥14,200,000)
Fiscal Year 2004 : ¥4,800,000 (Direct Cost : ¥4,800,000)
Fiscal Year 2003 : ¥4,200,000 (Direct Cost : ¥4,200,000)
Fiscal Year 2002 : ¥5,200,000 (Direct Cost : ¥5,200,000)
|Keywords||local public management / waste fee system / benchmarking / liberalisation / privatisation / public private partnership / cost accounting / municipal waste managemnet / public services|
The main purpose of this study is to throw light on the structural change of traditional leadership of self-governing body's public waste disposal after institutinalisation of "circulated social system", specially based on the comparative survey of case studies in Germany and Japan. This reseach is composed of the following 3 sub-themes forcussmg on the local public management.
1.The financing system of waste management in municiparity.
In order to compare characteristics between fee system in Germany and tax system in Japan, we analysed impact of changes on waste volumes and waste fee by recycling, and merit and demerit of eash financing systems compared with the other public services. After mat policy's effect and prospects or the waste disposal fee's als economical instrument or als financial ones are surveyed in each kontext of Germany and Japan.
2.The organisationforms and privatisation/liberalisation of kommunal waste management.
the organization forms of municipal waste management i
n Germany is very diversified by impact of privatisation of local waste management. In order to understand the transformation to the private sector, such as external consignment or PFI or PPP in Germany and Europe, two concepts of liberalisation are used, competition in-the-market and competition for-the-market Known as competitive tendering. And there are several models of liveralisation based on these two concedpts in Germany We analysed BDE-modell, SRU-Modell, Monopol-Kommission, BIfA-modell, and conclused by characterising of the waste services and cost-structure between waste collection and waste disposal.
3.Benchmarking for komparative survey of kommunal waste management.
In Germany benchmarking in public sectors are deveroped als the incentives on local governments to improve waste management efficiently, instead of kompetition in-the-market. We surveyed case studies of two types Benchmarking of INFA and BIfA in Hirakata-shi, Sasebo-shi and Fukuoka-shi. Now we start to introduce Benchmarking to another cities in Kanto, and we could develop the Japanese-Type or Benchmarking in locar waste management. Less