• Search Research Projects
  • Search Researchers
  • How to Use
  1. Back to previous page

Zum Brueckenbau zwiscshen Zivilprozess und Sragprozess.

Research Project

Project/Area Number 14520059
Research Category

Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)

Allocation TypeSingle-year Grants
Section一般
Research Field Civil law
Research InstitutionTbhoku-gakuin University (2003-2004)
Shimane University (2002)

Principal Investigator

SITO Tetsu  Tbhoku-gakuin University, 法務研究科, Prpf. (70235050)

Project Period (FY) 2002 – 2004
Project Status Completed (Fiscal Year 2004)
Budget Amount *help
¥2,200,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,200,000)
Fiscal Year 2004: ¥500,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000)
Fiscal Year 2003: ¥800,000 (Direct Cost: ¥800,000)
Fiscal Year 2002: ¥900,000 (Direct Cost: ¥900,000)
KeywordsSchweigepflicht / Saibaiin / Geschaeedigte / Schlichtung / Entschaedigung / Richter / Schoeffen / Prozessrecht / 附帯私訴 / 社会福祉 / ADR / 和解 / 犯罪被害者 / 刑務所 / あっせん / 社会福祉における苦情解決 / 児童虐待 / 私訴 / ニルス・クリスティーエ / 刑事調停 / 付帯私訴 / 参審制度 / 裁判員制度 / 司法参加 / 犯罪被害者の保護
Research Abstract

The original of the translation three points is writing of propeller Nils Christie of the detective reconciliation procedure in Norway. There is a system that tries the reconciliation of the criminal case with reconciliation on civil affairs in Norway though private citizen's claim system and victim participation system in the criminal trial were enforced in Japan as part of the reform of the judicial system. Positive professor Christie of the criminal policy of the Oslo university is a person who establishes the spiritual foundation in Norway, and it is thought that the above-mentioned translation is significant to know the thought of uniting the procedure of civil affairs and the detective.
An original target function of the summary court and the announcement in the future are the positions, the numbers of courts in our country, and should whats in the object of the comparison from the viewpoint of the access of the court from which everything it reported about shape based on the investigation of Germany and Britain as for positional circumstances of the court in these countries.
Saibanin is designed, the obligation to keep secrets presents the public attention at the people along with enforcement, and the discussion about the collection approval or disapproval presents briskness. However, an enough fundamental study has not been performed about the obligation to keep secrets yet. It goes back to the judge of a German system who it is a difference, and is the mother method country of the obligation to keep secrets in relations citizens' judicial participation systems and them of the occupation judge and the histories of the obligation to keep secrets, and a historical meaning is searched and, up to now, has been discussed with civil affairs and the detective in Japan. It is the one to offer basic material concerning the attitude to the obligation to keep secrets of the judicial authority in the civil affairs procedure in the future and the detective procedure.

Report

(4 results)
  • 2004 Annual Research Report   Final Research Report Summary
  • 2003 Annual Research Report
  • 2002 Annual Research Report
  • Research Products

    (10 results)

All 2010 2005 2004

All Journal Article (9 results) Presentation (1 results)

  • [Journal Article] 司法機関の守秘義務-裁判官ならびに司法への市民参加者の守秘義務を中心にして-2010

    • Author(s)
      齋藤哲
    • Journal Title

      東北学院法学 70(掲載予定)

      Pages: 1-50

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(和文)」より
    • Related Report
      2004 Final Research Report Summary
  • [Journal Article] Zur Schweigepflicht am Gericht2010

    • Author(s)
      Tetsu Saito
    • Journal Title

      The Tohoku Gakuin University Review of Law and Political Science 70

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(欧文)」より
    • Related Report
      2004 Final Research Report Summary
  • [Journal Article] <翻訳>展望のルーツ Roots of a perspective2005

    • Author(s)
      ニルス・クリスティーエ(訳齋藤哲)
    • Journal Title

      東北学院大学法学政治学紀要 13

      Pages: 99-112

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(和文)」より
    • Related Report
      2004 Final Research Report Summary
  • [Journal Article] 社会福祉法の定める苦情解決制度はADRとして機能するか2005

    • Author(s)
      齋藤哲
    • Journal Title

      地域福祉研究 33号

      Pages: 1-14

    • NAID

      40006837320

    • Related Report
      2004 Annual Research Report
  • [Journal Article] N・クリスティーエ「展望のルーツ」2005

    • Author(s)
      訳者 齋藤 哲
    • Journal Title

      東北学院大学法学政治学研究所紀要 13号

      Pages: 99-112

    • Related Report
      2004 Annual Research Report
  • [Journal Article] <翻訳>危険な国家 Dangerous states2004

    • Author(s)
      ニルス・クリスティーエ(訳齋藤哲)
    • Journal Title

      東北学院大学論集 63

      Pages: 232-214

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(和文)」より
    • Related Report
      2004 Final Research Report Summary
  • [Journal Article] <翻訳>理想的な被害者 The ideal Victim2004

    • Author(s)
      ニルス・クリスティーエ(訳齋藤哲)
    • Journal Title

      東北学院大学論集 63

      Pages: 274-256

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(和文)」より
    • Related Report
      2004 Final Research Report Summary
  • [Journal Article] N・クリスティーエ「理想的な被害者」2004

    • Author(s)
      訳者 齋藤 哲
    • Journal Title

      東北学院大学論集 63号

      Pages: 274-28

    • Related Report
      2004 Annual Research Report
  • [Journal Article] N・クリスティーエ「危険な国家」2004

    • Author(s)
      訳者 齋藤 哲
    • Journal Title

      東北学院大学論集 63号

      Pages: 232-214

    • Related Report
      2004 Annual Research Report
  • [Presentation] 簡易裁判所の本来的機能と将来について-アクセスに見る国内外事情を参考にして-2005

    • Author(s)
      齋藤哲
    • Organizer
      日本弁護士連合会
    • Place of Presentation
      弁護士会館2階「クレオ」
    • Year and Date
      2005-03-26
    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(和文)」より
    • Related Report
      2004 Final Research Report Summary

URL: 

Published: 2002-04-01   Modified: 2016-04-21  

Information User Guide FAQ News Terms of Use Attribution of KAKENHI

Powered by NII kakenhi