| Budget Amount *help |
¥15,900,000 (Direct Cost: ¥15,900,000)
Fiscal Year 2004: ¥5,700,000 (Direct Cost: ¥5,700,000)
Fiscal Year 2003: ¥10,200,000 (Direct Cost: ¥10,200,000)
|
|---|
| Research Abstract |
Translation termination in eukaryotes is governed by two interacting release factors, eRF1 and eRF3. The crystal structure of the eEF1-like region of eRF3 from S. pombe determined in three states (free protein, GDP-, and GTP-bound forms) reveals an overall structure that is similar to EF-Tu, although with quite different domain arrangements. In contrast to EF-Tu, GDP/GTP binding to eRF3c does not induce dramatic conformational changes, and Mg2 is not required for GDP binding to eRF3c. Mg2 at higher concentration accelerates GDP release, suggesting a novel mechanism for nucleotide exchange on eRF3 from that of other GTPases. Mapping sequence conservation onto the molecular surface, combined with mutagenesis analysis, identified the eRF1 binding region, and revealed an essential function for the C terminus of eRF3. The N-terminal extension, rich in acidic amino acids, blocks the proposed eRF1 binding site, potentially regulating eRF1 binding to eRF3 in a competitive manner.
Ribosome recycling factor (RRF) disassembles post termination ribosomal complexes in concert with elongation factor EF-G freeing the ribosome for a new round of polypeptide synthesis. How RRF interacts with EF-G and disassembles post-termination ribosomes is unknown. RRF is structurally similar to tRNA and is therefore thought to bind to the ribosomal A site and be translocated by EF-G during ribosome disassembly as a mimic of tRNA. However, EF-G variants that remain active in GTP hydrolysis but are defective in tRNA translocation fully activate RRF function in vivo and in vitro. Furthermore, RRF and the GTP form of EF-G do not co-occupy the terminating ribosome in vitro ; RRF is ejected by EF-G from the preformed complex. These findings suggest that RRF is not a functional mimic of tRNA and disassembles the post-termination ribosomal complex indepen dently of the translocation activity of EF-G.
|
