Comparative study of evaluator training programs and their operation, as conducted by external quality assurance agencies in overseas countries
| Project/Area Number |
15330182
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Sociology of education
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Japan University Accreditation Association, Division of Accreditation & Higher Education Studies |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
MAEDA Sanae Japan University Accreditation Association, Division of Accreditation & Higher Education Studies, Executive Associate Director, 大学評価・研究部, 部長 (40360739)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
KUDO Jun Japan University Accreditation Association, Division of Accreditation & Higher Education Studies, Associate Director, 大学評価・研究部・企画・調査研究系, 主幹 (70360740)
HAYATA Yukimasa Kanazawa University, Research Center for Higher Education, Professor, Assistant Director, 大学教育開発・支援センター, 教授・副センター長 (30360738)
MATSUMOTO Tadashi Rissho University, Faculty of Law, Professor, 法学部, 教授 (80031566)
ETO Hideki Meiji University, Faculty of Law, Lecturer, 法学部, 専任講師 (60308054)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2003 – 2004
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2004)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥8,600,000 (Direct Cost: ¥8,600,000)
Fiscal Year 2004: ¥4,500,000 (Direct Cost: ¥4,500,000)
Fiscal Year 2003: ¥4,100,000 (Direct Cost: ¥4,100,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | university evaluation / institutional accreditation / specialized accreditation / evaluator training / Bologna Process / quality assurance / 質保証 / 認証評価 |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
The purpose of this study is to examine evaluator training programs offered by external quality assurance agencies in the United States and four European countries, and based on the results, to seek desirable training programs applicable to Japanese accrediting organizations. The outline and results of our study are stated below.
1.The questionnaire survey was conducted at Japanese universities nationwide in order to determine the status of internal training programs thus enabling evaluators to carry out "self-study" within each individual university and to search for "desirable evaluator training programs" that each university may wish to receive from university accrediting organizations. The response rate was 78% of those surveyed, thus demonstrating a high level of interest regarding this issue.
2.To learn about evaluator training programs employed by the US university accreditation system, the scope of the survey included a total of ten institutions, specifically, four regional accre
… More
diting organizations and six specialized and professional accrediting organizations. The survey was conducted by two methods : 1)participation in training programs offered by three of the organizations and 2)interview of eight of the organizations. Such research in the United States enabled us to deepen our understanding of the current conditions of their evaluator training programs and to facilitate our collection of related materials. We were thus able to offer a better contribution to the improvement of evaluator training programs in Japan.
3.Through this survey, which was conducted in four countries in Europe, namely United Kingdom, Netherlands, Germany and France, it was found that evaluator training programs are not provided in these countries, with the exception of the United Kingdom. Nevertheless, by learning about each nation's educational reform movements aimed at attaining higher quality assurance in their systems of higher education, as based on the "Bologna Declaration," we were able to obtain useful suggestions on the proper level of quality assurance that should be achieved by Japanese universities after implementation of the certified evaluation system. It was also discovered that although they employ different evaluation systems, the United States and United Kingdom have similar ideas regarding evaluators and their training. Therefore, Japanese accrediting organizations have many things to learn from the training programs of these two nations, despite of a slight difference in actual practices. Less
|
Report
(3 results)
Research Products
(9 results)
-
-
[Journal Article] Evaluator Training2005
Author(s)
Jun KUDO
-
Journal Title
Japan University Accreditation Association, Division of Accreditation & Higher Education Studies University Evaluation No.4
Description
「研究成果報告書概要(欧文)」より
Related Report
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
