Exploring an encounter between logical thinking and religious tolerance in India : Jayanta Bha TTa's reference to the sarvAgamaprAmANya-vAda
| Project/Area Number |
15520046
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Indian philosophy/Buddhist studies
|
|---|
| Research Institution | The University of Tokyo |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
MARUI Hiroshi The University of Tokyo, Graduate School of Humanities and Sociology, Professor, 大学院・人文社会系研究科, 教授 (30229603)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2003 – 2004
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2004)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥3,500,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,500,000)
Fiscal Year 2004: ¥1,600,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,600,000)
Fiscal Year 2003: ¥1,900,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,900,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | Indian Philosophy / religious tolerance / logical thinking / Jayanta BhaTTa / sarvAgamaprAmANya-vAda / SaT-tarkI / SaD-darzana / upanaya / 「六つのタルカ」 / 正統と異端 |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
Indian culture has been marked by the tremendous power to include a great variety of heterogeneous elements. This tendency of inclusivism is also discernible in the writings of NyAya Philosophy in which logical thinking and pluralistic world view are stressed. Among important thinkers in this context is Jayanta (=J), a poet philosopher of NyAya (the latter half of the ninth century). The central research topic is to investigate the views referred to in his NyAyamaJjarI (=NM), that all religious traditions are authentic (sarvAgamaprAmANya-vAda). The main results are as follows.
(1)Scholars have wondered why J refers to those views without refuting them in spite of his strong denial of the validity of any anti-Vedic religion. My tentative answer is that J was probably aware that his arguments for the justification of the orthodox Hindu religions would not be fully convincing to anti-Vedic people, whereas he did not want to be too dogmatic and conservative.
(2)The concept of "the approval by mahAjana" plays an important role in J' s justification of the Vedas, though the meaning of the word "mahAjana" should be clarified. G. Chenparathy asserts that in NM the ambiguity of that term persisted, the quantitative aspect ("a great many people") being stressed. I have shown that J seems to understand the "mahAjana" in the qualitative sense only ("great or respectable people") as far as the explicit meaning is concerned.
(3)For a future extension of the present research, I have translated the substantial portion of the codanA-section of the ZlokavArttika in which the early stage of the svataHprAmANya-theory is found.
(4)As a tiny step toward reconstruction of the early NyAya system of logic, I examined the relevant materials to see whether or how the concept of liGgaparAmarza is linked with the explanation of the meaning of upanaya in the NyAya's five-membered syllogism. Moreover, the detailed study was made of the precise meaning of the "six tarkas" (SaTrarkI) in NM.
|
Report
(3 results)
Research Products
(9 results)
-
[Journal Article] 六つの哲学体系2005
Author(s)
丸井 浩
-
Journal Title
菅沼晃博士古稀記念論文集 インド哲学仏教学への誘い (大東出版社)
Pages: 24-45
Description
「研究成果報告書概要(和文)」より
Related Report
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
