Global Warming and Intergenerational Equity : An Axiomatic Approach
| Project/Area Number | 15530113 |
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Economic theory
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Otaru University of Commerce |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
SHINOTSUKA Tomoichi Otaru University of Commerce, Faculty of Commerce, Professor, 商学部, 教授 (40235552)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2003 – 2004
|
| Project Status |
Completed(Fiscal Year 2004)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥1,100,000 (Direct Cost : ¥1,100,000)
Fiscal Year 2004 : ¥500,000 (Direct Cost : ¥500,000)
Fiscal Year 2003 : ¥600,000 (Direct Cost : ¥600,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | Global warming / Intergenerational equity / Procedural equity / Consequentialist equity / Diamond's impossibility theorem / No-envy in lifetime consumptions / No-envy in overlapping consumptions / Equity in lifetime rate of return / 地球温暖化問題 / 効用の無限流列の評価 / 重複世代モデル |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
There exists a utilitarian tradition a la Sidgwick of treating equal generations equally. Diamond showed that no social evaluation ordering over infinite utility streams satisfying the strong Pareto principle, Sidgwick's equity principle, and the axiom of continuity exists. We introduce two versions of egalitarianism in the spirit of the Pigou-Dalbon transfer principle and the Lorenz domination principle, and examine their compatibility with the weak Pareto principle in the presence of the weak continuity axiom. The social evaluation relation is assumed neither complete nor fully transitive, yet Diamond's impossibility strenuously resurfaces.
We introduce several distinct notions of equity as no-envy into the overlapping generations economy formulated by Samuelson (1958). No-Envy in Overlapping Consumption requires that for each time period, no person prefer the bundle of any other person who lives in the same period. No-Envy in Lifetime Consumption states that no person should prefer the lifetime consumption plan of any other person. Equity in Lifetime Rate of Return requires that the lifetime rate of return (Cass and Yaari, 1966) be equal for all persons. For each of the three notions, we characterize allocations satisfying it, and clarify logical relation among these conditions. We also examine existence of a stationary allocation that attains maximal utility under No-Envy in Lifetime Consumption.
|
Report
(3results)
Research Products
(3results)
